Showing posts with label Beavers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Beavers. Show all posts

Friday, September 4, 2026

3715. Learning from Beavers: A Case Study of the Colorado River Crisis

By Kamran Nayeri, September 4, 2026


Anthropogenic crisis of the Colorado River

The anthropocentric industrial capitalist civilization has created existential crises: catastrophic global warming and catastrophic climate change, the Sixth Extinction, recurrent pandemics, and the nuclear holocaust.

In this essay, I will show how beavers, as social mammals that alter the environment to suit their lives, enhance or improve ecosystems. To support this claim, I will examine the anthropogenic crisis of the Colorado River. The Colorado River, which is five million years old, has been running with less and less water over the last few decades. Originating in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, the river is an important water source for seven U.S. states and two Mexican states before it eventually pours into the Gulf of California in Mexico.

Below are the major interventions in the Colorado River and how the crisis developed.

·       1922: The Colorado River Agreement is signed, which sets the amount of water taken from the river for the neighboring states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. Under a 1944 treaty between the United States and Mexico, the United States pledged that 1,837 million acre-feet of water from the Colorado River would be Mexico's share.

·       1930s: Major dam construction projects, including the Hoover Dam, were completed, which significantly altered river flow and water distribution.

·       2000s: Prolonged drought due to global warming and climate change led to a drop in water levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell, both created after the river dams were built. Currently, Lake Mead is at 28.5% capacity, and Lake Powell is at 26.2% capacity.

·       2012: The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation reported that the Colorado River is running short of water. 

·       2021: The U.S. government declared water shortages for the first time, prompting forced water cuts in Arizona and Nevada.

·       2023: Heavy rainfall is forecast, providing temporary relief, but experts warn that several more rainy years are needed for the water shortage crisis to fully recover.

·       2026: Water scarcity continues, as the ongoing negotiations between states to share water and protect it in the current dire situation continue. Phoenix, a city of 1.6 million people built in the heart of the Arizona desert, is on a short list of cities that may be deprived of Colorado River water.

The anthropogenic crisis of the oceans

Of course, the crises caused by anthropocentric industrial capitalist civilization threaten life on the planet everywhere.  Take, for example, the oceans' crisis. Human activities have now altered 66% of the marine environment. 35.5% of assessed marine fish stocks are overfished. Eleven million tons of plastic enter the oceans each year, almost one million tons per month.  Industrial fishing, greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels, industrial agro-runoff carrying fertilizer, organic matter containing phosphorus and nitrogen, plastics, transportation, coastal development, mining, and chemical pollution all interact and cause cumulative population and ecological losses. One particularly striking historical indicator is the decline of global fisheries: the proportion of fish stocks considered biologically sustainable has fallen from 90% in 1974 to about 64.5% in 2021.

Compare this behavior of humans, who consider themselves god’s greatest creation, with the life of beavers in relation to the rest of nature.  

Who are the Beavers? 

North American beavers have a stout body, a yellow-brown to almost black coat, and a wide, smooth, scaly tail. They have curtained hind legs and forefinger paws. The beaver’s stout body allows it to retain heat.

North American beavers are the largest rodents in North America and the second largest in the world (South American capybaras are the heaviest). They weigh between 16 and 30 kilograms, and the heaviest beaver on record weighed 50 kilograms. They are 1 to 1.2 meters long and 0.3 to 0.5 meters high. The shape of the beaver's tail varies, but it is generally about 5 centimeters thick at the base and narrows to about 0.6 centimeters at the tip.

Beavers have long, orange front teeth. These teeth grow continuously throughout their life and wear down with daily use. These teeth sharpen on their own and can cut off a part of a tree the size of a person's finger with a bite. If the front teeth are too long, they can prevent the beaver's mouth from closing, which can lead to starvation and death. Beavers' front teeth look dark orange due to the large amount of iron in the enamel, which is the hard outer layer of teeth. Iron strengthens tooth enamel and helps prevent teeth from breaking or cracking when a beaver chews.

Beavers move regularly between aquatic and terrestrial environments. Their small, agile front legs are well adapted for working on land. They walk on five toes, grasp wood with their front paws,  and their claws are suitable for digging. The hind legs are larger, with fur that is suitable for swimming, and are fur-free except for the dorsal surface.

The hind legs also have a finger to clean, the second toe on the inside, with a unique double nail. Beavers are very meticulous groomers. They use the sorting finger as a comb to prevent their soft, thin fur from knotting and to maintain its waterproof, insulating properties. These flexible toes also kill thorns and parasites.

On land, the beaver moves very slowly, making it vulnerable to predators. But in the water, the beaver swims up to 10 kilometers per hour. Its large lungs allow it to stay underwater for up to 15 minutes while swimming more than half a kilometer.

Their whiskers help to distinguish objects around the beaver's face and head, which are especially useful in narrow passages and dark waters. The blue dog's eyes have a thin, transparent membrane called the nictitating membrane, which covers the eyeball underwater.  Beavers' vision is only good at close range. His outer ears are small, round, and have valves that close when immersed, and the beaver has a developed sense of hearing.

The shape of the tail is an individual and family feature, ranging from short and wide to long and slender. It is almost hairless and is covered with black scales. There is a clear border between fur and scales.  The tail acts as a rudder in swimming, supports balance when working on the ground, and warns of danger by frequently crossing the water's surface when it hits the water. Beavers also store fat in their tail and eat more fat in the fall so that they can survive on the fat stored in their tail if food is not available in the winter. The vertebrae on the back of the beaver extend to the tail and almost to the end.

Beavers are found throughout North America except for the deserts of California and Nevada, and parts of Utah and Arizona. They live in nearby ponds, lakes, rivers, swamps, streams, and wetlands.

Beavers are one of the few animals that change their habitat as needed; they build wooden dams woven with reeds, branches, and saplings, then cover them with mud.  These dams reduce river erosion by creating ponds where water flows slowly. These ponds support a wide range of small aquatic organisms and provide water and food for much larger animals. By building these dams, beavers create new habitats that support a diverse ecosystem.

Beavers also build dome-shaped huts known as lodges, which are 2 meters or more high and can reach 12 meters in width. A cabin can have one or more underwater entrances, and Beavers live in a lodge above the waterline. These lodges are often built off the coast, forming islands.  The lodge chamber may be 1.2 meters wide and 0.6 meters high, with walls about one-third of a meter thick that  are insulated and ventilated by a small hole in the ceiling called a "chimney." They usually cover the floor with wood chips to absorb excess moisture and provide a suitable substrate. Beavers spend the summer and autumn building dams and collecting and storing food for the winter.

North American beavers typically live 10 to 12 years. The oldest recorded beaver has lived to be 30 years.

Beavers communicate with each other by wagging their tails on the surface of the water.

Beavers scent-mark the boundaries of their enclosures by spreading castoreum secreted from their anus. This pungent, concentrated liquid is produced for olfactory marking and leaves a lasting odor. This fat sac is also secreted to keep the beaver's fur dry. The oil varies slightly between the sexes and is used in reproductive communication.

Inside the lodge, beavers use a variety of sounds (although their voice boxes are rudimentary) and body postures to communicate with family members. At the Smithsonian National Zoo,  beavers can be heard barking when they are upset

Beavers are herbivores that eat leaves, woody stems, and aquatic plants. Their main building materials are also their favorite foods: spruce, willow, birch, and maple.

In cold climates, beavers spend the winter in the cabin of their hut, feeding on the branches they store on the muddy bottom of the pond. The water acts like a refrigerator, keeping the stems cool and maintaining their nutritional value. Beavers hold their food with their front paws and eat like corn on the cob.

Beavers are mainly nocturnal. However, in areas where ponds freeze during the winter season, beavers may stay in their habitats or under the ice and feed on their fat reserves.

In the residence and underwater, light radiation remains constant and low for 24 hours, so sunrise and sunset are not visible. In the absence of "solar signs," the beaver's activity is not in sync with the solar day. The circadian rhythm, or regular cycle of the day, is disrupted, and the beaver's "days" become longer, ranging in length from 26 to 29 hours. At the zoo, the beaver wakes up around 4 p.m.

Social structure

Beavers form strong family bonds. They are social animals, and each group includes a couple, this year's young, and offspring from the previous year. There may be one or more new adults who are 2 years old or older from previous breeding seasons. These new adults usually do not reproduce.

In the winter, these family groups live together in their hut and share a food pantry. Their family life is very stable and is based on a hierarchy with one-year-old and newborn children following their parents. Physical violence is rare, and sounds, gestures, and postures are used inside the lodge to express their place in the group hierarchy.

It is generally believed that beavers mate for a lifetime.  They breed in the winter, from January to late February, and females give birth in the spring.

The babies are born weighing about half a kilogram; their eyes open, and their bodies are completely covered in fur. They go into the water inside their residence within half an hour after birth. Within a week, they become skilled swimmers.

Babies usually suckle and suckle with their mother for the first few weeks, and their weight increases significantly. Females have four nipples and sometimes sit upright to breastfeed the offspring. Evidence suggests the nipples are divided equally among the babies, which may explain the high survival rate. All babies are breastfed for about six weeks, and then the whole family brings them solid food.

On land, mothers often carry the cubs on their broad tails, sometimes even walking upright and holding them in their paws. In the water, the cubs may rest on the mother's back. The cubs help maintain the lodge and raise the next generation. 

The role of beavers in the ecosystem

Beavers are one of the most powerful freshwater ecosystem-shaping agents in North America and Europe. By building dams, digging canals, and cutting down trees, they turn streams into meandering wetlands that store water, filter pollutants, protect wildlife, and even prevent wildfire from spreading.

Before European colonization, an estimated 60 to 400 million beavers lived in North American waterways (Young, November 2025). Intensive fur trapping by European American mountain men and settlers in the 19th century drastically reduced the beaver population in the Colorado River basin, driven by the high demand for fur in the global fur trade (Young, December 2025). Hunters in the 1820s and 1830s targeted tributary streams such as the Little Colorado River and exploited abundant beaver colonies to produce waterproof fur that fueled hat production in Europe and the eastern United States. This commercial exploitation, which culminated in the mid-19th century, pushed many of the Southwest's watersheds to the brink of extinction, as populations could not recover from incessant harvesting. Habitat changes intensified trapping pressure, as expanding agriculture, mining, and settlement in the arid Southwest disrupted marginal ecosystems essential to beaver survival. Land-use changes, including river canalization, clearing vegetation for agriculture and resource extraction, habitat fragmentation, and the decline of food sources such as willow and aspen, exacerbated the effects of over-trapping. This combined influx caused widespread wetland loss and destroyed river areas, turning vibrant water systems into dug canals and dry floodplains that lasted into the 20th century. Without beavers engineering ponds and slowing water flow, soil erosion intensified, biodiversity declined sharply, and the basin's water-holding capacity shrank, leaving a legacy of ecological simplification.

 Today, only 9 to 12 million beavers remain, representing an 80 to 98 percent decline from their historical populations. This decline has had a chain effect on ecosystems across the continent.

How beavers shape waterways

Beavers are often called "ecosystem engineers" because they physically regenerate the environments in which they live. A family of beavers can dam a stream, flood a canyon, and create a whole new wetland that didn't exist before. These dams slow water flow, spread it across the plain, and raise surrounding groundwater levels. At the source of the streams to which the beavers have been transported, about 243 cubic meters of water were stored in the first year due to the construction of dams 100 meters from the river.  This is enough to visibly change the hydrology of a small valley.

But what is happening underground is less visible. Beavers' dams direct water deep into the soil and regenerate groundwater. In a scientific study, the displaced beavers raised groundwater levels by up to one-third of a cubic meter and stored almost 2.4 times the groundwater of each dam. This is especially important in arid regions that rely on groundwater from wells because it maintains vegetation in the summer and prevents rivers from drying out. Dams also lower river temperatures, which helps cold-water fish species and slows evaporation in the warmer months.

Water treatment

Beavers’ ponds act like slow treatment systems for polluted water. When a stream accumulates behind a dam, sediments settle, and calm, low-oxygen conditions at the bottom of the pond create natural chemical processes that break down excess organic matter. This is especially valuable in agricultural areas where runoff carries nitrate and phosphate from fertilizers.

Research on beaver ponds in agricultural watersheds shows they can remove 5% to 45% of the nitrate load, depending on the season and pond conditions. In a study comparing upstream and downstream water quality in the beaver enclosure, nitrate concentrations decreased by 43% and phosphate concentrations by 51%. In the summer, when biological activity peaked, these reductions were even greater: 47% for nitrate and 61% for phosphate. Even in winter, ponds removed 37% nitrate and 38% phosphate. Compared with a nearby agricultural stream without a water dog, reductions were dramatic: 64% less nitrate and 86% less phosphate.

This treatment capacity is essentially free while municipalities spend millions of dollars to treat built wetlands.

Enhancing ecosystem diversity

Beavers create wetlands for far more species than streams and forests that are replaced. Open beaver ponds combine muddy edges, standing dead trees, and dense growth, forming a series of microhabitats that attract everything from insects to large mammals  (Larsen et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2019).

Recent comparisons between beaver-built wetlands and man-made ponds found that beaver ponds attracted more than twice as many floating flies and 45% more butterflies than nearby artificial ponds. On a typical night, beaver ponds hosted an average of 5 species of bats versus 4 species in other parts of the same river, showing a 22% increase in diversity. These differences likely stem from the structural complexity of beaver wetlands. The combination of standing dead wood, live shrubs, aquatic plants, and varied water depths creates feeding and nesting opportunities that a simple pond cannot match.

Beaver ponds also provide vital habitat for amphibians, waterfowl, and songbirds. Flooded trees create nesting holes for woodpeckers and owls. The warm, calm shallow waters are ideal for frogs and salamanders to mate. The lush vegetation on the edges of the ponds also attracts deer, reindeer, and other herbivores to drink and feed.

A complicated relationship with salmon

The relationship between beavers and fish is one of the more complex parts of their ecological story. In many environments, beaver ponds increase fish populations. The slow, deep water provides shelter from predators, and the organic matter that accumulates in the ponds feeds the insect larvae that the young fish eat. Studies have documented higher fish densities, faster growth rates, and better survival of juvenile salmon in beaver-pond habitats than in open streams.

But this relationship is not always positive. In large river floodplains with extensive tributary channels, beavers' dams can fragment habitat by blocking fish passage between the ponds and the main river. Research on two rivers in Alaska showed this clearly. In one river where beavers built many dams in tributary channels, juvenile salmon density in beaver-created ponds was 3 to 12 times lower than in habitats connected to the spring stream and the main channel. The researchers estimated that without dams, the floodplain of that river could raise nearly three times as much salmon and produce almost twice as much fish biomass.

Context matters. In small, degraded streams with limited habitat complexity, beaver activity usually helps fish by deepening ponds, cooling the water, and adding structure. In floodplains that are already well connected, a large number of dams can fragment the system and reduce total fish production. This is why fisheries managers sometimes evaluate waterfowl and salmon interactions on a river-to-river basis and do not enforce general rules.

Fire resistance

In the western United States, which is prone to wildfires, beavers have been known to be unexpected agents of preventing wildfires. By raising groundwater levels, moistening soil in floodplains, and preserving green vegetation in dry summers, beaver dams create bands of moisture in arid landscapes (Murray, 2025;

Studies of wildfires in the western United States showed that in the Rocky Mountains region, Beaver Ponds reduced the intensity of burning in areas around floodplains of large fires. The mechanism is simple: moist soil and lush vegetation, such as dry grass and dead shrubs, don't burn. Beaver wetlands essentially create fire barriers along river paths.

This effect has practical implications for the community. Networks of moist, fire-resistant habitats created by beavers can slow the spread of flames and give firefighters more time to arrive. Some fire prevention managers in the western U.S. are now considering relocating the beavers or constructing similar dams  (man-made structures that resemble water dog dams) as a low-cost strategy to increase fire resistance in landscapes.

Why beaver population decline matters

The loss of 80 to 98 percent of North America's beaver population means the disappearance of millions of dams, ponds, and small wetlands that had shaped the continent's hydrology for thousands of years. Streams that once ran through vast, humid floodplains. Wetlands dried up. Groundwater levels dropped.  The ecological transformations that beavers offered for free, from water storage to nutrient treatment and habitat creation, disappeared along with them.

Restoring the beaver population won't solve all of the watershed's problems, but evidence suggests that even a small number of beavers can tangibly improve water storage, water quality, biodiversity, and fire resistance within a year of human-assisted reintroduction

Human-assisted restoration efforts in the Colorado River basin include relocation programs that relocate beavers from areas that generate conflict or have been relocated to areas that are less occupied and suitable for regeneration (Sadiq, 2025). These initiatives aim to leverage beavers' natural dam-building to improve riparian habitats, conserve water in drought-prone areas, and support ecosystem recovery throughout the arid watershed. A notable example is the 2019 transfer project led by Utah State University researchers, which relocated beavers to tributaries such as the Price River to restore degraded waterways by promoting wetland formation and sediment absorption. In Colorado, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Administration has pursued strategies to strengthen populations in strategic areas, moving from lethal control to relocation where possible to maximize habitat benefits. These programs often involve collaboration between state wildlife agencies such as Colorado Parks and Wildlife and conservation organizations such as the Colorado Beaver Working Group, which coordinates efforts to expand the Blue Dog's presence in the basin's historically appropriate but currently uninhabited areas. By targeting places where blue dog engineering can improve water infiltration and biodiversity, these restorations complement broader restoration goals amid ongoing water scarcity.

Conclusion

The key difference between human activity in human-centered industrial capitalist civilization and beaver activity is that while human activities tend to destroy ecosystems, the beaver community builds its environment in ways that enhance ecosystems and biodiversity. Both behaviors are the result of species evolution. For 2.5 million years, the genus Homo, our ancestors, interacted with the rest of nature largely like hunter-gatherers. Even our species, Homo sapiens, which appeared about 300,000 years ago, behaved similarly because we were also hunter-gatherers who saw ourselves as inseparable from nature and lived by a culture of ecocentrism. However, with the advent of agriculture in the Holocene, groups of early farmers emerged and began to domesticate plants and animals to create an artificial ecosystem called the farm. This required a radical cultural shift from ecocentrism to anthropocentrism. The farm required farmers to dominate and control plants and animals for their benefit, and it also saw wild nature as a threat that had to be cleaned up when needed. Mother Nature became a source of wealth that could be exploited whenever it wanted. The Beavers Society teaches us that it is possible and better to return to ecocentrism and love of nature and culture versus having a culture.

References:

Clements, Charlie D.  and Dan N. Harmon. “Beavers and Riparian Habitats.” The Progressive Rancher. March 8, 2023.

Ebbs, Stephenie. “How Beavers Could Help the Colorado River Survive Future Droughts.” ABC News. April 20, 2023.

Larsen,  Annegret, Joshua R. Larsen, Stuart N. Lane. “Dam Builders and Their Works: Beaver Influences on the Structure and Function of River Corridor Hydrology, Geomorphology, Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems.” Earth-Science Reviews.  July 2021.

Murray, James. “How Did the Loss of Beavers Affect the Environment?” The Institute for Environmental Research and Education.  August 27, 2025.

Pobis, Madison. “How Reintroducing Beavers Can Build Watershed Resilience.” Woods Institute of Environment, Stanford University. 

Sadiq, Muhammad. “The Story of a Town Saved by Beavers.” Animals Around the Globe. April 16, 2025.  

Singhai, Swasti. “As the Second-Largest Reservoir in the Nation Drops, So Does Tourism.” USA Today. August 31, 2026.

Wan, Luwen. “How Reintroducing Beavers Can Enhance Ecological Health.” Stanford Report. August 11, 2025.

Wu, Haipeng, Jin Chen, Jijun Xu, Guangming Zeng, Lianhai Sang, Qiang Liu, Zhengjie Yin,  Juan Dai, Dacong Yin, Jie Liang, and Shujing Ye. “Effects of Dam Construction on Biodiversity: A Review.” ScienceDirect. June 2019.

Young, Laura. “Was There a Prehistoric Beaver?” The Institute for Environmental Research and Education. November 8, 2025.

___________. “Why did the beaver population decrease?” The Institute for Environmental Research and Education. December 6, 2025. 

Sunday, October 25, 2015

2062. Can Beavers Save the World?

By Esther Ingles-Arkell, Gizmodo, October 21, 2015

We’ve already seen how beavers can save California from its seemingly endless drought. Now it looks like they can save the world from industrial farming by changing the chemistry of the water, making them natural biochemists.
For quite some time, the world starved for nitrogen. It’s a necessary component for life, and essential for growing crops. Nitrogen makes up most of the atmosphere around us, but getting it out of the air and into the soil could only be done by certain plants and creatures. As nitrogen was sucked from the soil, crop land grew less and less productive and people went hungry. The discovery of nitrogen fixation — grabbing nitrogen from the air and putting it into fertilizers — has saved billions of people from starvation.
But every discovery has its drawbacks. Nitrogen fertilizers on farm land get washed into streams, where they fuel an algae population boom. The algae use up the oxygen in the streams, the rivers, and eventually parts of the ocean, leaving nothing for the fish and leading to large “dead zones.” 
Biologists at the University of Rhode Island were studying the nitrogen content of streams and noticed something odd: whenever there were beaver ponds upstream, nitrogen levels dropped. Beaver ponds slow down river water, and they mix it with organic matter, which must have an effect on river chemistry, but scientists didn’t know exactly what was happening in that murky water. 
So they made soda-bottle-sized “ponds” that let them study variations on the conditions the beavers set up in their real-life ponds. And they found a kind of reverse nitrogen fixation process was occurring — call it “denitrification.” Bacteria in the dirt and the plant debris turned nitrates into nitrogen gas. The gas bubbled up to the surface and mixed with the atmosphere once more. In some cases, the level of nitrogen in the water dropped 45%. 
The effect was most pronounced in small streams, which lead to bigger rivers and eventually to the ocean. Beavers often set up their homes in these tiny streams—or they did before they were trapped or driven away. Re-introducing them might completely change downstream chemistry, make these environments more livable not just for the beavers, but for their fellow creatures, too.

2061. Beavers: A Potential Missing Link in California's Water Future

By Alastair Bland, Water Deeply, October 16, 2015
A beaver adds a stick to its lodge on Tolucay Creek in Napa, Calif., on July 23, 2015. Photo: Rusty Cohn.
On California’s central coast, a region that usually receives drenching rainfall or fog for most of the year, some forests are now as arid as a desert. Streams that once ran at least at a trickle through summer have vanished in the ongoing drought, and environmentalists and fishermen fear that local salmon will disappear if climate conditions don’t improve.
The landscape desperately needs rain.
It could also use beavers, according to ecologists who say the near eradication of Castor canadensis from parts of the West in the 19th century has magnified the effects of California’s worst dry spell in history.
“Beavers create shock absorption against drought,” says Brock Dolman, a scientist in Sonoma County who wants to repopulate coastal California with the big lumberjacking rodents.
Beavers are a hated pest and a nuisance in the eyes of many landowners and developers, and the animals are regularly killed with depredation permits and by fur trappers. However, they are also a keystone species whose participation in the ecosystem creates benefits for almost all other flora and fauna, Dolman says. This is because of the way beavers’ hydro-engineering work affects the movement of water.
“Beavers aren’t actually creating more water, but they are altering how it flows, which creates benefits through the ecosystem,” says Michael Pollock, an ecosystems analyst and beaver specialist at the National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Science Center.



By gnawing down trees and building dams, beavers create small reservoirs. What follows, scientists say, is a series of trickle-down benefits: The water that might otherwise have raced downstream to the sea, tearing apart creek gullies and washing away fish, instead gets holed up for months behind the jumbles of twigs and branches. In this cool, calm water, fish — like juvenile salmon — thrive.

Meanwhile, the water percolates slowly into the ground, recharging near-surface aquifers and keeping soils hydrated through the dry season. Entire streamside meadows, Dolman says, may remain green all summer if beavers are at work nearby. Downstream of a beaver pond, some of the percolated water may eventually resurface, helping keep small streams flowing and fish alive.

Dolman, co-founder of the Occidental Arts & Ecology Center in Sonoma County, says this water banking process could even, in theory, partially offset the worrying shrinkage of mountain snowpack, historically California’s most important water source.

Dolman and his colleague Kate Lundquist, who are leading their organization’s “Bring Back the Beaver Campaign,” would like reintroduction of beavers from other regions to begin now as a measure for restoring salmon populations and building general drought resilience into the landscape.

In Oregon, something along these lines is happening. Here, a newly proposed Coho recovery plan would make it illegal to kill or harm beavers within the geographical range of the imperiled fish.

But in California, there is a problem: Government biologists aren’t entirely sold on the virtues of beavers. Kevin Shaffer, a fisheries biologist with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, believes that beavers can have benefits for a watershed that is temporarily deprived of rainfall. Eventually, though, even beavers cannot cancel out the effects of long-term drought or climate change.

“As the drought gets worse, their ponds will dry up and the animals will just move somewhere else,” he says. “They won’t stay because there is no more water.”

Shaffer adds that introducing beavers into an environment that has been seriously stressed by drought may benefit nothing — not fish, not plant life and not the beavers themselves.
Releasing beavers can also create conflicts with people, especially in heavily populated watersheds like the Russian River, just north of San Francisco.

The California Department of Fish and Wildlife classifies beavers as a “nuisance” species. That’s because, Shaffer explains, the animals’ activity can have direct negative impacts on people. Dams can inundate properties, and falling trees could potentially land in roadways.
In spite of agency uncertainty, the benefits of beavers on a landscape are considered fact by scientists in California’s North Coast region. Sarah Beesley, a fisheries biologist with the Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program, has been running a habitat restoration effort on the lower Klamath River system, where a small beaver population currently resides. Her goal is to increase the presence of year-round water, especially in slow-moving wetlands, by building stick dams that closely mimic those built by beavers. In the future, her project hopes to reintroduce beavers themselves to streams that the animals don’t frequent.

In several stream systems in the region, says Beesley, the only places where salmon — especially endangered Coho — have survived after four years of below-average rainfall are beaver ponds.

“Wetland features, whether built by people or by beavers, are definitely what’s getting the salmon here through the drought,” says Beesley.

Beavers still live in the Klamath drainage system. They also occur, among other places, in the Central Valley, near the Mexican border and in parts of the Sierra Nevada.



However, there is ongoing debate about where beavers historically lived — a debate that could hinder progress in any reintroduction campaign.

Dolman and Lundquist contributed to a report published in 2013 in the journal California Fish and Game that revealed evidence of beavers having inhabited regions of coastal California where they don’t live today. The evidence included beaver remains and accounts from early explorers. Similar literature has been produced making the case that beavers lived throughout the Sierra Nevada. As a prelude to reintroducing the animals, they hope to establish as fact that beavers once played key ecological roles in many watersheds.

Beaver reintroduction has seen success in Washington, where the Methow Conservancy has identified beavers as a valuable tool for restoring damaged watersheds. The organization has participated in relocating more than 300 beavers into the headwaters of the Methow River system, which feeds the Columbia River.

Heide Andersen, stewardship director at the conservancy, believes the ongoing decline of salmon on the West Coast began partly as a result of losing beavers.

“Beavers impact almost every aspect of the watershed,” says Andersen. “They lower stream temperatures, retain sediment, create refuge for fish, and create groundwater percolation that reappears downstream later in the year. When beavers disappeared, streams became channelized, we lost our flows earlier in the summer, and temperatures went up.”

While rain is sorely needed throughout California, the absence of beaver infrastructure could make the landscape less able to rebound should a more generous hydrological period resume. Dolman explains that, without woody debris in the creek gullies to slow water down, the land has less opportunity to soak it up when rain does fall. The result is raging floods in the winter and, once summer comes, a watershed that rapidly goes dry again.

“Losing beavers is a double whammy for a watershed,” Dolman explains. “You get exacerbated flooding, erosion and sediment, and reduced groundwater recharge, in the winter. Then, in the summer, you have land that dries up faster because you didn’t get that winter recharge. We’ve created a landscape much less resilient to drought.”

Alastair Bland is a freelance writer based in San Francisco. He can be reached at allybland79@gmail.com or via Twitter at @allybland.