Sunday, June 28, 2026

3694. Cuba's President Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel on Free Market Reforms: "Reality Demands Urgent and Necessary Changes"

By Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, Granma International, June 18, 2026



Speech delivered by Miguel Mario Díaz-Canel Bermúdez, First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Cuba and President of the Republic, at the closing of the Extraordinary Plenary Session of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, at the Palace of the Revolution, on June 17, 2026, "Year of the Centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz."

Comrades, members of the Party’s Central Committee;

Distinguished guests;

Compatriots:

This extraordinary plenary session is taking place at a decisive moment for Cuba. As proud heirs to the legacy of the Commander-in-Chief, we Cuban revolutionaries today face challenges of enormous magnitude that demand unity, ideological steadfastness, courage, boldness, and creative resilience.

We are guided by our leader, a prominent member of the vanguard of the Centennial Generation and a zealous guardian of the continuity of the socialist Revolution—which he played a decisive role in building from its foundations to the present day—Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, Hero of the Republic of Cuba, who has taught us every day the sacred value of unity.

The context is extraordinarily complex and challenging due to the relentless aggression of the intensified economic, commercial, and financial blockade imposed by the United States government and the criminal intent behind the hostile actions of the current administration: first, the inclusion of Cuba on the infamous and spurious list of countries that allegedly sponsor terrorism, and other equally false accusations that seek to discredit the government’s authority and administration, while depriving the country of any source of foreign exchange.

This blockade has been further intensified by the Executive Orders of January 29 and May 1st, which reinforce the genocidal energy blockade and, through secondary sanctions, internationalize the blockade, taking financial, energy, and investment persecution to extremes of maximum pressure.

At the same time, political and ideological subversion is intensifying through media disinformation on social media to undermine the Revolution’s credibility—among both Cubans and foreigners—fostering social disorientation in a national and international context marked by profound transformations in the socioeconomic structure and global geopolitics, as a consequence of the unlimited powers of a hegemonic imperialist policy that seeks to shatter multilateralism, fuels neo-fascist movements, and exacerbates global tensions, constantly threatening international peace and security and attempting to break the indispensable unity of leftist forces.

The silent genocide being waged against Cuba is causing immeasurable damage and terrible hardships in our daily lives as a people, while its perpetrators brazenly lie to the world by denying the energy blockade and claiming that we are blocking the entry of million-dollar donations—donations they tout extensively but have delivered hardly anything of what was promised.

Cuba is resisting heroically and creatively, but for far too long it has suffered a barbaric, undeserved, and unbearable punishment, to which is now added the threat of military aggression as a new weapon against our collective resistance.

Cuba faces a cruel blockade and real, daily financial persecution that drives up the cost of every drop of fuel, every medicine, every food item, every part, and every piece of technology the country needs.

Reality demands urgent and necessary changes. And when life for the people becomes so difficult, the primary duty of the Communist Party and the revolutionary government is not to explain the crisis better, but to change whatever needs to be changed to overcome it.

What is required is a comprehensive and agile economic agenda, executable in the short term, that combines macroeconomic stabilization, incentives to stimulate and promote productive openness, legal certainty, the attraction of investment, intensive use of technology, and targeted and effective social protection.

Let us recall that at the closing of the 11th Plenary Session, we stated that the postponement of the Congress did not preclude the possibility of making the necessary changes, modifications, and adjustments, taking into account the powers of Party and government structures—such as the Plenary Sessions of the Central Committee when it comes to resolutions adopted by Party congresses.

To this end, intensive work has been carried out, based on the informative report and debate from the ANEC Congress, the public consultation on the Economic and Social Program for 2026, the opinions of economists and experts, the debates and contributions made by the Economic Commission of the Party’s Central Committee, the Economic and Social Policy Guidelines approved and updated at the 6th, 7th, and 8th Party Congresses, the proposals of the 11th Plenary Session of the Central Committee, and the work carried out by the commissions that have been preparing the documents for the postponed 9th Party Congress—for reasons that are well known—regarding the update of the Conceptualization of the Economic and Social Model, the Guidelines, and the National Plan for Economic and Social Development through 2030.

In addition, a study has been conducted on the experiences of socialist construction in other countries, such as China and Vietnam, and artificial intelligence has also been utilized to further the search for references and evaluate the proposals in relation to our current laws and regulations.

We are facing the enormous challenge of continuing to advance the process of socialist construction, defending the Revolution and its achievements, and perfecting our society, under the conditions of a country subjected to the cruelest, most genocidal, and longest-lasting economic, financial, energy, and commercial blockade imposed by the world’s most powerful nation. And to overcome this, the legacy we have is that of our Commander-in-Chief, Fidel Castro Ruz (Applause).

No one in the history of humanity has ever faced the challenge of socialism under the conditions that this country, this nation, and this people are currently facing! We will undoubtedly overcome this challenge through unity, courage, popular participation, and full conviction in our ability to achieve victory.

The transformations we are proposing are intended to advance the defense of socialism, to support and expand social justice, and to create economic wealth and distribute it equitably. Without wealth, there is nothing to distribute; we would be speaking of social justice in the abstract. Social justice as conceived by the Revolution—with its humanistic mission to help the most disadvantaged, generally through free welfare programs and projects—does not cost the people anything, but it does cost the State. And to carry it out, to deepen it, to sustain it, and to maintain it, the State needs wealth—and we must produce that wealth ourselves. If there is no wealth, there is no social justice, and everything else is a fairy tale—everything else is a fairy tale! Either we produce under these conditions, create wealth, and then distribute it with social justice and equity—not egalitarianism. That is the challenge!

We need to unleash the productive forces, to have more production rather than more restrictions, because it has been proven that control without supply merely drives operations into the informal market.

Equality and integration among economic actors are necessary in accordance with the National Plan for Economic and Social Development through 2030 and the territorial and local development strategies involving state-owned enterprises, MSMEs, cooperatives, agricultural producers, foreign and Cuban investors, residents and non-residents alike: all must act and contribute to the country’s socioeconomic development under clear rules.

We must export and produce to attract and bring in foreign currency and make productive use of it. Every unit of foreign currency that enters the country must be channeled to finance production, imports, investment, wages, and infrastructure.

Legal certainty must be guaranteed: contracts, usufruct rights, leases, concessions, surface rights, and licenses must offer temporal stability and protection against arbitrary changes. Without legal certainty, no one will invest, and no one will take risks.

We must promote digitalization with traceability: electronic invoicing, digital payments, public registries, and interoperable data as a foundation for reducing tax evasion and corruption.

Social protection must be prioritized: replacing inefficient blanket subsidies with direct support for vulnerable people. We must always ensure that each action does not increase social inequalities; on the contrary, they should be gradually reduced until they disappear.

We must act with selective and intelligent openness: attracting technology, financing, markets, and external knowledge, while protecting strategic sectors through regulation, not through stagnation.

A gradual and experimental approach is necessary: reform should be implemented in phases and through verifiable pilot programs, maintaining government leadership and adjusting course based on evidence to address and minimize potential economic and social costs.

Also essential are political unity to ensure the consistency and credibility of the measures; clear and precise communication of the decisions to be implemented, to gain support for the transformations; and the adoption of compensatory mechanisms to mitigate economic and social impacts.

We must work with agility, consistency, and quality—and above all, with control. What has been approved must be implemented properly.

In this scenario, it is necessary to make progress on at least five fronts simultaneously:

Macroeconomic stabilization and the recovery of foreign revenue.

The transformation of the Economic and Social Model.

The stimulation and recovery of the agricultural sector.

The strengthening of accounting and cost management.

Anticipating and mitigating the social costs associated with the necessary transformations of the Economic and Social Model.

And these five aspects are very well developed in the report presented by ANEC at its last congress.

The Commander-in-Chief taught us that in times of crisis we could not give up on either development or critical thinking, that no obstacle is insurmountable, and that there is always an opportunity to grow. And along that path, the Army General showed us that it is possible, that it was possible, and that it will always be possible.

The people understand the causes of many of the difficulties we face, but they also need concrete answers, timely decisions, and results that are felt in their daily lives.

There are obstacles that do not come from outside or from blockades. There is sluggishness, bureaucracy, regulations that hold back those who want to produce, and decisions we have put off. What depends on us, we must change ourselves—and we must change it now.

We owe our homeland to the resistance, but today resistance alone is not enough. This time demands that we transform, produce more, remove more barriers, listen more, make better decisions, and be accountable.

What we intend to set in motion is an emergency economic and social agenda, comprising measures that are part of our Government Program and policies approved by the Party, along with decisions that can no longer wait. Some will not enjoy unanimous consensus, but they cannot be postponed. And each will have a specific person in charge, a defined deadline, a metric to measure its implementation, and public accountability to the nation.

What works will be expanded. What does not work will be corrected without delay. Anyone with a responsibility will have to be held accountable for it, and when someone cannot meet the demands of this moment, they must responsibly make way for someone who can do it better.

We will face this process as the challenge of the generations that today share the defense of the Homeland, the Revolution, and Socialism.

Regarding the Economic Management System, I want to emphasize that the most important point is that, if we adopt these transformations, central planning would not serve to manage the economy, but rather to create an appropriate institutional and regulatory environment so that enterprises and workers are encouraged to produce goods and provide quality services efficiently, as well as to introduce innovations into their management for these purposes.

And we must definitely ensure that the Plan is built from the ground up with the participation of workers.

We will continue restructuring the government apparatus, the state, the Party, and our institutions. We will integrate structures where necessary, review duplicated functions, reduce unnecessary steps, and continuously optimize the way the country is governed and served. These structures must be more dynamic, more proactive, and less bureaucratic.

One of the most important and urgent tasks is to boost the country’s development from the ground up, starting with the municipalities.

We cannot delay any further in empowering municipal governments and ensuring they have and exercise all possible authority to develop.

No economic change will be sufficient if socialist state-owned enterprises—which will remain the fundamental pillar of the economy—do not have the genuine capacity to manage, innovate, and be accountable for their results.

It is necessary to reform the management of state-owned enterprises based on real autonomy, economic and financial evaluation, the separation of state and business functions, and the application of the "comply or explain" principle to prevent regulations from becoming an obstacle when a more beneficial and demonstrable solution exists.

To that end, we will move forward in two directions: greater real autonomy for enterprises and more professional management of state assets through the National Institute of Business Assets, which is tasked with representing the owner of the means of production, evaluating results, demanding efficiency, and better separating the business function from the regulatory function of the ministries.

Autonomy does not mean a lack of control; it implies a framework of accountability. It means being able to make timely decisions, form better partnerships, invest more effectively, pay better wages, and be accountable for results to the people and to the State.

We need to strengthen state-owned enterprises, not replace them with administrative mechanisms that paralyze them. To this end, we must complete the separation between state and business functions, evaluate performance using economic and financial tools, and grant real autonomy to manage material, financial, and human resources—with subsequent oversight, transparency, and accountability.

There is no sovereignty with empty plates. The Cuban people’s food will be treated for what it is: a matter of national security.

And idle land in Cuba must be eliminated. Every piece of land that is currently overgrown with marabou—when it should be producing food—will require a clear solution: either it is put to productive use or it is handed over to those willing to do so.

We will expand the granting of land in usufruct to those who are willing and able to produce: producers, cooperatives, micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), and other forms of association—without ever renouncing national sovereignty or regressing to the dependent country we left behind with the Revolution.

We will recognize the right of those who work the land to invest in what they need to make it productive, and we will allow those who commit to real results to import seeds, fertilizer, parts, and equipment directly. But one principle must be clear: that land will continue to belong to the people; and if it does not produce, if it does not serve the country, if it does not fulfill its social function, it will have to pass into the hands of those who can indeed make it productive.

We cannot continue to demand that Cuban farmers produce more food with fewer tools and at prices below their costs; they must have effective mechanisms for direct access to foreign currency, such as selling to exporters—as is the case with tourism—or on the foreign exchange market.

We must make the land an opportunity rather than a burden; ensure that those who sow see the fruits of their labor; enable those who produce to live better lives; and provide those who invest in the countryside with security, support, and a future.

Cuba needs its farmers, their work, and their trust. When the Cuban countryside becomes a path to prosperity for those who work it, the country will be stronger, more just, and more sovereign.

With regard to foreign trade, exports, logistics, and value chains, we must authorize direct imports and exports for state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises—whether they are productive, export-oriented, or import-substituting—while maintaining technical and fiscal requirements but eliminating mandatory intermediation.

Regarding debt renegotiation, we must carry out a debt-for-assets swap process, focused primarily on exchanging national assets for debt, without permanently relinquishing ownership of those assets. Through this mechanism, we can secure financing and other benefits without losing ownership rights over the assets.

We must also explore other mechanisms, such as "debt-for-nature" or "debt-for-social-development" swaps, the issuance of bonds tied to the Sustainable Development Goals, and others.

We will comprehensively review the list of activities prohibited to the private sector, guided by a clear principle: to replace, whenever possible, prohibitions with responsible regulation. The country needs to establish legal pathways for these activities, with clear rules and appropriate controls.

We will also make the scope of the corporate purpose of MSMEs and other economic actors more flexible and significantly alleviate the bureaucratic burden currently faced by many entrepreneurs; furthermore, we must streamline the creation of economic partnerships between state and non-state management models.

Foreign investment is also trapped in a web of obstacles that hinder its necessary growth. We must not only tell foreign investors where to invest, but also allow them to take the initiative to invest in the economic sector of their choice, as well as to directly hire their workers without state intermediaries at all times.

We must authorize foreign direct investment in the national private sector, including MSMEs, with clear rules on ownership, repatriation, reinvestment, and dispute resolution.

We must facilitate investment models with different modalities and involving all stakeholders on the part of Cubans living in Cuba. And to Cubans living abroad who wish to invest, donate, import technology, open a market, or launch a project in their homeland, we will offer a clear, stable, and respectful framework, without them being viewed with suspicion for wanting to help their own people or contribute to the development of the land where they were born. To anyone who wants to build a future with Cuba, without seeking to impose anything on it, we say with our hearts on our sleeves: this is your home, and our door is open to you, because at this moment, this homeland cannot afford to lose a single good Cuban (Applause).

A power outage isn’t just a matter of megawatts or a generation shortfall. A power outage is the child who couldn’t study for a test, the food that went bad in the refrigerator, the elderly person who spends the night awake, restless, and sweltering. It’s the hospital operating at full capacity, the doctor’s office that can’t store medication, the worker who loses a day’s pay, and the business that has to close. That is why energy is not a technical issue; it is a human, economic, and national issue.

We will accelerate the integration of solar energy into the national economy, as we have been doing. To achieve this, we will facilitate the direct entry of foreign companies that supply panels, batteries, inverters, and related solutions, reducing the number of intermediaries that drive up costs for the population and for the country.

Import tariffs on solar technologies, storage systems, and energy-saving equipment have already been eliminated. Now we will also move forward with eliminating taxes on their sale and on services related to their installation and maintenance.

In addition, we will create credit and financing mechanisms so that these solutions are not accessible only to a few, but can gradually reach households, micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), medical clinics, educational centers, nursing homes, and other essential services for the population. And in this effort, our Cuban companies and technicians—both state-owned and private—will be at the center, installing, maintaining, repairing, integrating, and creating jobs. Cuban companies can specialize in the installation, integration, operation, and support of these technologies.

We will promote electric transportation powered by renewable energy sources. Any electric vehicle intended for public, private, or light-duty freight transport that demonstrates it operates entirely or primarily on solar energy will be eligible for special incentives, tariff exemptions, elimination of sales taxes, and facilitation of imports of chargers, batteries, parts, and related solutions.

We will also promote the installation of solar panels throughout the country with foreign, private, cooperative, and state investment, prioritizing urban routes, tourist hubs, productive zones, and essential services. Along with this, we will establish an expedited process for granting licenses for transportation operators, electric taxis, or associated mobility services, under clear rules, technical oversight, road safety standards, and transparent pricing.

The top priority, above all else, is the people who cannot wait for the economy to improve, because there are hardships that know no deadlines. True social justice is not built on artificial prices that eventually lead to shortages, long lines, low wages, and an illegal market.

Social justice is built on real foundations: incomes with purchasing power, direct protection for those who need it most, and a national economy capable of producing more. There are no shortcuts; these are not new ideas, but decisions that the country discussed and approved years ago. The mistake was not in proposing them, but in postponing them—and that period of delay must come to an end.

The basic food basket will be guaranteed to retirees, families with chronically ill children, and vulnerable populations. Targeted programs will be developed to promote social transformation in the poorest neighborhoods. The state-owned and private business sectors must be given a greater role and incentives to get involved in solving prioritized local problems, such as soup kitchens, sanitation, and shelters for children without family support, among others. These decisions will entail new, concrete tasks: delivering pension payments to retirees near their homes so they do not have to wait in line for hours under the sun; sponsoring soup kitchens, nursing homes, senior centers, and children’s centers; creating solidarity quotas and cost-based pricing for those who truly need it; and digitizing everything so that it is clear who contributes, who receives, and what results are achieved.

For years, we operated under a system of wage controls, price regulations, and a government that subsidized a huge portion of the country’s economic life. That formula had its rationale, its context, its results, and its time; but it no longer addresses the complex reality we face today. The prices families face have become far too disconnected from the income of workers and retirees, and we cannot continue to act as if that gap did not exist.

We will also open new avenues for secure access to medications.

Regarding fiscal, tax, monetary, and financial restructuring policies, we propose that the primary objective for reducing the fiscal deficit lies in increasing production—which is the basis for tax revenue—and cutting unnecessary budget expenditures. That is why we will also correct a policy that failed to deliver the expected results.

Price caps, in practice, failed to curb inflation. They often led to product shortages, a shift toward the black market, higher prices, lower tax revenue, and an impossible race between actual prices and administrative decisions that were always late or remained rigid in the face of changing economic realities, thereby limiting all those who wish to conduct their economic activities legally and transparently. For this reason, we will not continue to impose blanket price caps, as the Prime Minister explained. We must correct distortions in the tax system that currently drive up the costs of production chains and ultimately get passed on to the final price.

We will move toward a creditable value-added tax (VAT) progressively supported by electronic invoicing to avoid cascading taxation. But these decisions can only be implemented alongside more direct and effective social protection, with a shift from subsidizing products to subsidizing people, and with efforts to restore the purchasing power of wages and pensions. It is not a matter of leaving anyone to fend for themselves in the market; it is a matter of providing better protection, increasing production, regulating intelligently, and managing with realism.

We need a financial system that supports the economy, serves the needs of the various economic actors, reduces lines, facilitates payments, ensures transparency in transactions, and turns savings, credit, and investment into concrete tools for development.

We must thoroughly modernize the country’s banking and financial system. To do so, Cuba needs banks that are more agile, more digital, closer to the people, and more useful to those who produce, export, import, invest, or start businesses.

We will open up opportunities—under strict regulation—for private and foreign financial institutions; new mechanisms for credit, productive financing, the development of financial markets, and payment services, in which state, cooperative, and private actors can participate. The goal is to ensure that collecting a pension, receiving a remittance from abroad, paying for a service, applying for a loan, financing a harvest, purchasing equipment, or moving money to support production is not an obstacle course.

We will allow offshore accounts, foreign-currency payments between companies, and auditable international transactions for entities that import, export, or provide global services.

This is not about weakening the role of the state, but rather about expanding and modernizing the country’s capacity to finance production, support those who generate goods and services, regulate the flow of money, and provide better service to our people.

We will turn digital transformation, software, and artificial intelligence into cross-cutting tools to develop agriculture, the energy sector, healthcare, education, foreign trade, banking, e-commerce, logistics, tourism, and tax enforcement.

Specific proposals related to software, artificial intelligence, the knowledge economy, and the digital economy must be presented as cross-cutting infrastructure to boost national productivity. This is not merely about exporting software, but about digitizing payments, taxes, foreign trade, agriculture, healthcare, energy, logistics, government, and statistics.

With regard to tourism and the real estate sector, new business models must be implemented, with the participation of all economic actors. We must develop a productive, regulated real estate market that includes: leasing of idle state-owned properties; rental of buildings, commercial spaces, warehouses, offices, tourist facilities, workshops, and industrial spaces; concessions; rights of use for real estate; and transparent bidding processes open to state, private, cooperative, or mixed-ownership entities.

We have discussed fuel imports and all the opportunities that have been opened up to the private sector, but now the goal is to achieve this with reasonable, transparent, and non-exploitative profit margins.

As for vehicle imports, we must eliminate all import barriers, prioritize the import of electric vehicles, and, of course, develop solar panel manufacturing facilities.

I know there is concern—and rightly so—about the partial dollarization of the economy, inflation, and the lack of many products priced in local currency. We are not going to ignore this problem. The business models we are authorizing in foreign currency must directly and verifiably contribute to an increase in foreign exchange revenue that allows for the sustainability of offerings in local currency.

We must impose stricter requirements on the use of digital payment platforms. We must expand approvals for wholesale and retail trade, eliminating intermediaries, and, without a doubt, we must implement electronic invoicing.

We must eliminate wage barriers that prevent the retention of talent and a highly skilled workforce in the productive, export, technology, energy, and agro-industrial sectors, and allow for variable compensation in CUP and foreign currency linked to verifiable results in exports, import savings, increased productivity, innovation, energy availability, or foreign sales.

With regard to digital government, public data, and smart monitoring, we must implement mandatory and phased electronic invoicing for medium and large taxpayers; then move on to micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) and self-employed workers, using simple tools adapted to actual connectivity.

We must modernize the National Statistical System and the ONEI through digital data collection from companies and entities, publication via public service applications using artificial intelligence, and the protection of sensitive data.

We must use artificial intelligence to simplify procedures, process scanned documents, detect errors, validate files, authenticate documents, and reduce administrative burdens.

We must improve the quality of services provided to the public by designing new approaches to each issue.

And we must seriously address a problem that affects the daily lives of millions of Cubans: solid waste collection. We will launch local projects to improve the collection, treatment, and disposal of solid waste, in which—responsibly—those who place the greatest burden on the system must also contribute more to sustaining it.

But this solution will not be solely state-led; it will incorporate foreign investment into the non-state sector, the business system, communities, and creative initiatives that help restore cleanliness, order, and health to our cities and communities.

Comrades:

Cuba does not need further delays; it needs solutions. It is not a matter of creating more offices or holding more meetings, but of achieving concrete results.

To govern is to solve problems, remove obstacles, provide support, and ensure that decisions translate into real improvements; because creating in Cuba, investing in Cuba, working in Cuba, and staying in Cuba also depend on the country’s ability to blaze new trails, organize intelligently, and support those who want to contribute.

Alongside economic opportunities, we will also promote concrete spaces where young people can take action within their communities.

The Community Youth Network must be a pathway for young people to find places to receive training, find employment, serve their community, and turn an idea into a real project. This network must coordinate useful initiatives in neighborhoods: revitalizing public spaces, supporting vulnerable people, cultural and sports activities, training in trades and technologies, community communication, productive projects, local employment, and support for at-risk youth.

This is not about creating yet another structure or bringing young people together merely to receive guidance; it is about giving them skills, tools, knowledge, responsibilities, and real opportunities to transform the places where they live—because staying in Cuba must also mean having a place where they can be useful, grow, learn, lead, and build a future starting from their neighborhood, school, workplace, and municipality.

We know our country; we know where the obstacles lie, where corruption lurks, where there is excessive red tape, and where a sense of shame and dignity is lacking.

Every measure we announce will have designated leaders, deadlines, and performance indicators. We will report on what is progressing, what is not being met, and what needs to be corrected.

There will be matters that, to protect them from those who wish to sabotage them, we will have to handle with discretion. Martí has already taught us that some things must remain hidden in order to be achieved; but discretion will never be an excuse to hide anything from the people.

As a people, we are not going to come together merely to resist; we are going to come together to create, to produce, to decide, to hold others accountable, to prosper, and to transform, because what we are starting today is not something a government does— this is something we all do together—or it won’t be done at all: with the farmer who returns to the fields to plant, with the small and medium-sized business that dares to take risks, with the technician who installs the first solar panel, with the teacher, with the doctor, with the young person who decides to stay and invest in their homeland, with the Cuban living abroad who reaches out, with you, with me, with everyone.

We will not deny the problems; we will not defend bureaucracy; we will not close the door on talent; we will not abandon the vulnerable; and we will never allow the suffering of this people—caused by the perverse imperialist blockade—to be used against the sovereignty of our homeland (Applause).

Nothing will be impossible if we embrace the challenge as an opportunity and history as inspiration!

Céspedes, Agramonte, Maceo, Gómez, Martí, Mella, Villena, Guiteras, Che, Camilo, Almeida, Fidel, and Raúl—all our heroes—faced moments that were just as difficult, or even more so, for their time, than those faced today by the new revolutionary generation, and all emerged from those challenges with honor and glory—even those who fell in combat without living to see victory—because they bequeathed to us lessons in courage that endure to this day, as was demonstrated on January 3 of this year when 32 Cuban combatants fell while confronting elite troops vastly superior in numbers and resources.

No revolution has had it easy, and ours has had the audacity to survive six decades of a blockade, genocidal laws, hybrid warfare, and a series of unilateral coercive measures that no other nation has endured—nor could it endure—for so long.

On the centennial of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro’s birth and the 95th birthday of Army General Raúl Castro Ruz, the best tribute we can pay to the admirable work of our two historic leaders is to defend it and preserve its essence of social justice, amid the storm of predatory wars, threats of invasion, and processes of neocolonization that, like the Seven-League Giant, are sweeping across the sky, devouring worlds in these times.

We are all called to action, and together we will prevail.

Long live Free Cuba! (Shouts of: "Long live!")

Long live the heroic Cuban people! (Shouts of: "Long live!")

Long live the sovereignty of the Cuban nation! (Shouts of: "Long live!")

Socialism or Death!

Fatherland or Death!

We will prevail! (Shouts of: "We will prevail!")

(Applause.)

3693. “In Cuba, There’s No Food Shortage; It’s a Wage Shortage. People Can’t Afford to Get Food.”

By Claire Boobbyer, Adventure.com, June 24, 2026

Photo credit: Reuters.com

Editor's note: There is a paucity of sources on how everyday life is for the Cuban people. The state-owned and run Cuban mass media do not report on it. Socialist media supportive of the Cuban revolution do not report on it. Reports from corporate media in the West, particularly the United States, are biased against the 1959 revolution and socialism. In this context, I am publishing the following report, shared by a Canadian socialist living in Cuba. It throws light on a misreporting of "food shortages" in Cuba.  I have not edited the article.

*     *     *

The US oil blockade has created huge geopolitical and economic pressures for Cubans, leading to government advisories warning against travel to Cuba. But while the island remains open for visitors, what is everyday life like for local people and businesses reliant on tourism? Cuba expert and frequent traveler Claire Boobbyer reports.

The last monthly pay cheque of 6,000 CUP (US$10; )[CUP is convertible peso to dollars at a fixed rate—ed.]  Tania Rodríguez received for work at a foreign-managed hotel was in February. Speaking from her home in central Cuba, the university graduate says the government offered her replacement work as a hospital cleaner for 3,000 pesos a month (US$5). She declined.

Later, cleaning work at a beach hotel emerged, but it meant sleeping on-site—not possible with elderly parents and a young child. Rodríguez cooks on her patio with charcoal—a 20-liter bottle of gas on the black market is unaffordable at 60,000 pesos (US$90). She’s emotional as she relates how she sells clothes, shoes, sheets of wood lying around the house; she’s contemplating selling a fridge and water tank to buy food. “We are going downhill without any brakes,” she says. She credits her family’s survival to a friend, a Canadian tourist she met years ago, who tops up her bank card.

An oil blockade imposed on January 29th by the Trump administration has almost paralyzed Cuba. Blackouts hit islanders for 22-23 hours a day, fuel prices have shot up, and cross-country transport is withering. Water supply is increasingly unavailable to many homes as water pumps need a power supply, hospitals are struggling to function, and many medicines are only available on the black market. The energy choke triggered airlines to begin pulling out, and countries including the UK, Ireland, Switzerland, and Australia banned non-essential travel to Cuba. In a shock move, Canada, historically the source of most of the island’s visitors for decades, repatriated its tourists in February.

In 2017, Cuba’s tourism sector generated USD$3.3billion, 10 percent of the country’s GDP, writes Paolo Spadoni, Associate Professor at Augusta University and co-author of a recent book, The Cuban Tourism Industry. Tourism is a big player; it’s said that up to 500,000 Cubans are directly and indirectly linked to the industry, relying on wages, revenue, and tips.

It feels like a different place today. At a poetry reading last month at the Ojo del Ciclón cultural spot in Havana’s old quarter, Urszula Abolik, a Polish American who’s been visiting Cuba for 12 years, was one of just two tourists. “I’ve never seen Havana that quiet. These artists and dancers … they still show up for their art, but it’s very hard for them right now. You cry that Havana is like that.”

During Abolik’s two-week stay, she danced tango, stayed in a B&B where the power never failed, moved around in local fixed-route taxis and bicycle rickshaws, and saw small groups of tourists from China, France, and Argentina. At a packed solar-powered club listening to the charanga-style (Cuban dance music) Aragón Orchestra, Abolik was the only foreigner, and the only diner at the superb Buena Vista Social Curry Club during a set by acclaimed Cuban pianist José Portillo.

The unfolding crisis in 2026 has deeper roots. The US Embargo against Cuba, imposed in 1962, has been tightened over the years. In 2021, President Trump placed Cuba on a State Sponsors of Terrorism List, crippling its ability to receive foreign aid and process financial transactions. The move nullified the ESTA visa-waiver scheme for entry into the US too, for travelers who visited Cuba on or after January 12th 2021. Over 67 years of the Castro family rule, internal mismanagement of its centrally planned economy has prevailed, COVID-19 further devastated tourism, from which it never fully recovered, while over-investment in tourist hotels post-pandemic squeezed out services in greater need.

This dismal picture is borne out by the figures. Between January and April this year, the island recorded 328,608 visitors, a 56 percent drop against the same months last year. At Cuba’s tourism height, in 2017-18, a few years after President Obama normalized relations with the US and eased travel restrictions, almost five million people visited for the rich culture, nature, and beach resorts. With all this in mind, who is still advocating for travel to Cuba?

In typical circumstances, UK-based Cuba specialist tour operator Love Cuba sends 5,000-6,000 travelers to the island each year. But despite the UK’s Foreign Commonwealth Development Office (FCDO) advising “against all but essential travel to Cuba”, its CEO Damien O’Brien says about 20 people a month are heading there with Air Europa, the only airline flying from mainland Europe, with specialist insurance.

Love Cuba offers transfers to Havana hotels and the all-inclusive beach resorts of Varadero, Cuba’s premier 13 miles of sand, two hours east of Havana. Cuba’s state-owned hotels, a major source of revenue, have historically been ringfenced, powered by generators, and with reliable sources of food. As the electricity supply has been on the blink since COVID-19, Cuba’s private entrepreneurs and new Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Businesses (Mipymes) have imported power storage systems such as EcoFlow—tapping power from sockets or solar panels—to run businesses and homes.

Saturday, June 27, 2026

3692. Cuba Pushes Through Sweeping Free-Market Reforms in Biggest Economic Shift Since the Revolution

By Andrea Rodriguez, Associated Press, June 19, 2026

A man sits on a sidewalk in Havana as the island suffered power outages in October. 
Norlys Perez/Reuters.

HAVANA (AP) — Observers on Friday called Cuba’s new free-market reforms the most sweeping economic overhaul of the island’s communist economy since the Cuban revolution, as the grandson of former President Raúl Castro said in an interview that Cuba must seek to move its economy forward.

The 176 measures aim to further decentralize Cuba’s state-run economy, which has been left gasping by a tightened embargo under President Donald Trump. Under the island’s current economic model, the government largely determines what is produced, who produces it, the prices at which goods are sold and how the country’s resources are allocated.

The plan includes more space for private businesses, imports and exports without state intermediation, free hiring of personnel, authorization for private banks, and investment by Cubans abroad. It even permits fast-food chains to establish themselves on the island.

“Elements that for decades were listed as pillars of the revolutionary economy, such as the state monopoly on foreign trade and the centralization of productive forces, have been dismantled,” said Luis Carlos Battista, a Cuban-American political scientist and lawyer who is a doctoral candidate at the University of Salamanca.

Cuban leaders like former President Raúl Castro – who still wields significant power on the island – have sought to push forward more limited reforms of Cuba’s economy in the past, but efforts have run into bureaucratic hurdles. In passing the reform, Cuban authorities cautioned that implementation could be slow, and noted measures will not be viable if the U.S. does not lift the energy and financial embargo on the island.

Since January, Cuba has been under a harsh energy and financial embargo imposed by the U.S., effectively blocking Cuba off from fuel, it’s main energy source, and deepening the crisis had already been deteriorating for the past five years. Blackouts have lasted up to 20 hours a day and have restricted access to health services, transportation and education.

U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged that they are maintaining a policy of maximum pressure to change the island’s political and economic system, which has endured for six decades despite U.S. pressure. They have not ruled out the use of military force.




3691. Cuba's President: “Trump Seeks to Suffocate Cuba So That There Will Be a Social Explosion and He Will Have a Pretext to Intervene”

By Miguel Díaz-Canel,  El Diario.es (translation printed in Socialist Action), June 6, 2026. 


June 5, 2026

Translation: Walter Lippmann. 

Miguel Díaz-Canel [Photo above] is the president of Cuba. He leads a country of just under ten million inhabitants, located 90 miles from Florida. Since the 1959 Revolution, Cuba has been a target of every US administration. But now the situation is particularly extreme and tense, to the point that some compare it to the Cuban Missile Crisis (1962), following the tightening of the US embargo with energy cuts and secondary sanctions against companies that do business with Cuban state entities. This latest tightening of the screws, on May 1st, has meant that, as of this week, Visa and Mastercard payments can no longer be made in Cuba , as Spanish hotel companies like Iberostar and Meliá have decided to abandon their hotels on the island after several decades in the country.

The blockade imposed on Cuba is felt in the country’s daily life, in the power and water outages that disrupt communication, streets without traffic lights, uncollected garbage, roads without traffic, and hospitals unable to operate normally. And with each passing day, the situation becomes more critical: it is another day of the blockade; uncertainty weighs heavily; and the suffering intensifies for a population that sees the hottest months approaching without fans to help them through the night and is forced to cook with charcoal.

In that context, the President of Cuba receives elDiario.es in a room of the Presidency of the Republic transformed into a garden evocative of the times of the struggle in the jungle, with plants and rocks brought from Sierra Maestra, designed by Celia Sánchez, a combatant of the Revolution commanded by Fidel Castro.

“Invading Cuba would cost Cuban lives, it would cost hundreds of thousands of Cuban lives, but it would also cost the invader great human losses in all kinds of cases,” the Cuban president stated regarding the hypothesis of a US attack that US President Donald Trump has threatened in recent weeks.

The interview with Díaz-Canel below takes place on Wednesday afternoon, June 3, just hours before the Trump Administration ramped up pressure on Havana with sanctions against the Cuban president, his family, the Armed Forces, the Committees for the Defense of the Revolution, relatives of Raúl Castro, and other people and entities in the country.

During our time in Cuba, we’ve been able to visit schools, hospitals, and rice fields, and we’ve seen firsthand how the blockade affects people, especially the most vulnerable. Given this situation, what can the government and you, as president, do to improve people’s lives?

The blockade today is brutal, criminal; it’s something the Cuban people don’t deserve. The most cruel aspect of the blockade is its duration—more than 60 years—and the greatest cynicism is how this blockade is accompanied by a narrative that tries to make the true culprit invisible and attempts to transform reality by blaming what they call the failed state. What we are experiencing is the accumulation of the blockade’s effects; we had other options for survival, progress, and work.

But after 2019, the blockade took on a different quality when the Trump Administration imposed 240 new measures: financial and oil persecution was intensified, and we were included on a list of countries that supposedly support terrorism, which cuts off all possibilities of accessing credit, and makes relations with financial agencies at the international level very difficult.

In the midst of all that, COVID-19 hit, and the Biden administration maintained the same tightened blockade. And now, this second Trump term has been extremely aggressive toward Cuba, especially in recent months.

Once the blockade against Venezuela was being implemented, when the military presence in the Caribbean was increasing to levels unprecedented in the last ten years, and Venezuela was blockaded, fuel shipments stopped. We’re talking about December of last year. Then came the entire media campaign to attack Venezuela, the kidnapping and extradition of the president and his wife to illegally try him in a US court.

And the first executive order arrives.

On January 29, Trump declared the energy blockade against Cuba, and on May 1, he signed another executive order that internationalized the blockade with the concept of secondary sanctions, where sanctions can be imposed on those who are going to have a relationship with Cuba and those who already have it: it is no longer only against American citizens or against American companies, it is against companies or citizens from anywhere in the world.

This accumulated escalation has also led to a policy that tends to seek suffocation in order to create a rupture within Cuban society, to provoke a social explosion, and a pretext for intervention with a narrative that makes the true culprits invisible.

Let’s talk about food production: there are no fertilizers, no pesticides, no agricultural inputs, no fuel for farm machinery, no medicine for animals. We are using science and innovation, employing agro-ecological techniques, and we have to rely more on animal traction. And today we have planted a larger area of farmland than in the last 15 years.

But there’s less yield, production is more difficult, and transportation is also affecting us. For example, today we have a ship in port with more than 15,000 tons of rice; that’s enough to distribute three pounds of rice per capita to the entire population of Cuba this month. But now we have no way to immediately transport what’s due to each province because of logistical problems.

Today, it is more difficult to find someone willing to sell us wheat for our daily bread and to buy powdered milk for children on the international market.

Healthcare, one of the country's pillars, is also being hit hard.

We have a robust healthcare system that has proven its effectiveness for years. We can share medical services with other countries and provide free medical training to students from around the world. Even American medical students have graduated in Cuba. And yet today, our hospitals lack the energy they need due to power outages.

Therefore, there is a waiting list for surgery of over 100,000 patients, including more than 12,000 children. Just look at the devastating impact of the blockade. Our doctors and nurses arrive in the mornings to fulfill their humanitarian duty to their patients, perhaps having had a very poor night’s sleep due to the power outages, or because, if they had electricity at home in the early hours, it was the only time they had to take advantage of the situation to get through all the chores they’ve been putting off. They also struggle to get around by public transport, as it’s limited due to the fuel shortage. But they arrive and attend to their patients.

All of this is affecting certain health indicators.

We have always had an infant mortality rate comparable to that of the most developed countries. That infant mortality rate, which at other times was around four, even reaching 3.6 [per thousand live births], has now doubled, standing at just tenths above nine. And it remains a competitive rate internationally, but it is not the one we are used to.

We have programs for the care of children with cancer that are very effective but are limited by a lack of medicines or supplies, and therefore, the survival rate of those children suffering from cancer decreases.

In recent months, through enormous effort and by exporting medical services and biotechnology from our pharmaceutical industry, we have managed to produce a certain quantity of medications. Currently, we have approximately 50% of what we have produced in recent months that we have been unable to distribute to the most remote areas of the country, where these medications are intended, precisely because of logistical challenges caused by the fuel shortage.

Despite having medicines produced by us, they do not reach the population, which is affected by more than 67% in the basic list of medicines.

All of this is also reflected in the economy, logistics, transportation, production processes, and service processes.

Tourism has declined because the government has targeted and pressured travel agencies. Many agencies are withdrawing from the country against their will due to this pressure. Fuel shortages are preventing airlines from flying to Cuba and refueling their aircraft for the return flight. All of this has severely limited tourism, which was one of our main sources of income.

All of this leads to a contraction in the supply of goods and services available to the population, and inflation reduces the ability of our people to meet their needs. Wages lose purchasing power, and the relationship between wages and prices becomes severely unbalanced. This generates feelings of frustration and weariness among the population.

And how do you deal with that?

A key element is the shift in the energy mix. We are in the midst of an energy transition. Last year, we increased the share of renewable energy from 3% to 10%, with over 1,000 megawatts of installed photovoltaic capacity generating more than 48% of daytime electricity, sometimes reaching 50%.

On the other hand, we have been recovering power that was not available from thermoelectric plants with distributed generation [small installations], with more than 1,000 megawatts that could be generating electricity and reducing blackout levels, but they do not work because there is not enough fuel.

We have to rely on our domestic energy source, crude oil, and it powers our thermoelectric plants. This crude is heavy, and we’ve applied science and innovation to refine it. If we now increase domestic crude oil production, we can also generate surpluses for thermal power generation and other economic processes.

Furthermore, we are implementing biomass and biogas. And we do not relinquish our right to acquire fuel on the market, which is severely restricted due to enormous pressure. The enforcers of the U.S. government apparatus exert pressure every time they learn that a ship is coming with the intention of reaching Cuba.

Only one Russian ship has arrived in over five months, and for 15 days, it changed the energy situation, proving that we are not a failed state. A failed state could not survive in this situation, nor could it demonstrate that when it has resources, it can do things differently.

We have also introduced changes to our marketing methods. We have opened up fuel imports to the private sector. But the Cuban private sector has only been able, in recent months, to import around 27,000 tons of fuel, of which 6,000 tons are gasoline and 21,000 tons are diesel. The 6,000 tons of gasoline represent less than half of the country’s monthly consumption, and the 21,000 tons of diesel are enough for a week of electricity generation.

The blockade is so brutal that the fuel we need isn’t getting through, but we’re not going to give up.

He was talking about the latest round of sanctions, the one on May 1st. It happened to me this morning at the hotel; I went to pay for a drink in the cafeteria, and my credit card wouldn’t go through.

Today it was announced that the entity that handled credit cards is withdrawing from the country.

And this week we also learned that Iberostar and Meliá are withdrawing from the country. What do you expect from the Spanish government and the European Union regarding the departure of two leading Spanish tourism companies from Cuba as a result of US sanctions?

They have been investing in Cuba for a long time, they have worked tirelessly with our tourism entities, they are businessmen whom we greatly respect, and they are leaving against their will.

Just as they have been able to develop their businesses in Cuba, they have also brought knowledge to the Cuban tourism sector. And that is why we have a hotel infrastructure built on the country's investments, which can be used today, for example, as assets to offset debt or generate business.

But on the other hand, there is learning, professional training for our people.

There will be hotels that we will have to operate, and we are considering different business models with Cubans who want to invest in and manage hotels. We are open to that, including people from other countries or entities that don’t have accounts in the US or any US ties, and who are willing to work with Cuba. We have offered this business opportunity to Cubans residing abroad. I am sure that many will return to Cuba to continue their businesses, but it won’t be easy given the stubbornness with which the US administration has tried to hinder the development of tourism in Cuba, which it knows is a source of income.

“[Iberostar and Meliá] have been investing in Cuba for a long time, they have worked tirelessly with our tourism entities, they are businessmen whom we greatly respect for the support they have always provided, and they are leaving against their will.”

Spain and Cuba are among the most important countries in our trade relations. We are united by traditions, history, and family ties. The Spanish government has been very respectful of Cuba, and the European Union, for the most part, has always supported the Cuban resolution at the United Nations against the blockade. I believe that now the European Union and Spain must also understand that the blockade not only affects Cuba, but that it is also affecting Spanish citizens, European citizens, and European and Spanish businesses and entities.

Spanish and European banks cannot have relations with Cuba; today it is more difficult for a Spanish tourist to get to Cuba, and European or Spanish investors have to face coercive obstacles and pressures.

No country in the world has the right to act as the global policeman or dictate the fate of other nations. Therefore, the European Union and Spain itself must address this issue and protect their businesses and citizens. They cannot allow extraterritorial laws to be imposed on them from another country, laws that contradict the very principles enshrined in European constitutions and the Spanish Constitution.

“The EU and Spain have to face this and they have to protect their businesses, their citizens. They cannot allow extraterritorial laws to be imposed on them from another country, laws that contradict the very principles enshrined in European constitutions and the Spanish Constitution.”

There was a declaration last April, at the IV Summit of Democracy in Barcelona, against the military intervention in Cuba , in which Spain and other Latin American countries participated.

It was a moment of support from Spain, which has made some humanitarian aid donations at this time.

You were just talking about that first Trump administration, which introduced the ESTA restrictions and represented a radical shift from the Obama administration, which was among the most open to Cuba in recent times. In fact, one of the consequences of those Trump sanctions was that the US did not supply ventilators to Cuba during the pandemic.

Trump intensified the blockade in the second half of 2019, and in January 2020 he included us on the list of countries that supposedly support terrorism. And Biden maintained it.

We received our first COVID case in March 2020, and we had already sent Cuban medical brigades to areas that were the epicenter of the pandemic. At the time, these were regions of Italy. The brigades supported local authorities, worked with the population, and earned tremendous respect and affection, and they learned how to manage the disease. In the first year of the pandemic, we maintained control, and by the end of 2020, we reopened the border.

Many Cubans who had been abroad for a long time wanted to return and see their families at the end of the year. And with the arrival of that avalanche, cases began to multiply, and we fell into a very strong pandemic peak in 2021. By mid-2021, we realized that Cuba had no options with the vaccine distribution mechanisms that existed in the world, and, on the other hand, we had to increase the number of intensive care units so that they wouldn’t collapse, as they had in other parts of the world, including the United States.

This allowed us to see a decrease in infection rates by the end of 2021, when over 60% of the population was vaccinated, and subsequently maintain control of the disease. We were the first country to vaccinate children over the age of two. We were among the top ten or twelve countries with the highest number of vaccine doses administered per capita.

In the midst of this intensified blockade, with blackouts, lack of supplies and lack of medicines, when we go to look for ventilators for the intensive care units, the United States Government prevents American companies from marketing this type of technology with Cuba.

We had to design ventilators that enabled us to produce what we needed, and today we have the capacity to export them.

Once again, science and innovation, among the legacies of the Revolution bequeathed by Fidel, enabled us to achieve these results.

And there is a third fact that also demonstrates the brutality and perversity of the blockade. In the midst of this situation, with a high number of hospitalized patients, our medical oxygen production plant broke down, and we had to send the replacement part to a European country. The United States government prevented entities in Latin America and the Caribbean that produced medical oxygen from selling it to Cuba. Other countries, including Russia, supported us; we were also able to receive ventilators and medical oxygen from China and other countries.

That shows you that they were condemning a group of patients to die from lack of oxygen. And that’s how the country faced the pandemic, and we were able to manage the disease better than other wealthy countries that weren’t under blockade. And that has a lot to do with our inclusive and free healthcare model. Given this whole situation, the wealthy were able to receive better care than the poor, but in the end, the pandemic didn’t respect or differentiate between rich and poor; it claimed many lives globally. And I believe that’s an experience from which humanity must also learn lessons.

In the United States, there’s a lot of talk about the possibility of an attack on Cuba. Various hypotheses are being discussed, from an operation like the kidnapping of Maduro, using Raúl Castro’s indictment as a pretext, to other types of operations. In fact, Democrats in Congress have introduced several war powers resolutions to try to prevent this scenario. Do you think it’s possible?

Cuba is a country that wants peace; we are a country of peace. It is a lie what representatives of the US government say about Cuba being a threat to US national security.

Ten million inhabitants on a blockaded and besieged island cannot be considered an extraordinary and unusual threat to national security, as they have claimed, for the most powerful nation in the world. This is a pretext fabricated to inflame world public opinion and justify the possibility of military aggression against Cuba.

Aggression is increasingly prevalent in the rhetoric of U.S. government spokespeople. This rhetoric is intensifying, and every day, there are reports of plans to attack Cuba; every day, U.S. media outlets describe how such an attack could take place. They compare it to Venezuela, but we don’t want war; we want dialogue.

But we are not afraid of war, and we are preparing to face military aggression. We are preparing according to the concept of our military doctrine, which is the war of the entire people, a doctrine of defense with the participation of the entire population to defend ourselves.

That is also a deterrent, because invading Cuba would cost Cuban lives—hundreds of thousands of Cuban lives—but it would also cost the invader heavy human losses in any scenario. It would be a complex outcome for the United States and our country, but it would also threaten the stability and security of Latin America and the Caribbean.

“Invading Cuba would cost Cuban lives, it would cost hundreds of thousands of Cuban lives, but it would also cost the invader great human losses in all kinds of cases.”

I believe the United States is pursuing three scenarios: the first is economic strangulation, provoking social unrest, and then using that social unrest as a pretext for intervention in the country under the guise of humanitarian aid. We see examples of this in Haiti, where Haiti is becoming increasingly impoverished, and the Haitian people are facing an ever more complex situation.

A second scenario is to pursue a coercive dialogue with Cuba, using maximum pressure to seize control of the Cuban economy in order to economically occupy the country, which would then allow them to bring about a change in the political system. This is the United States’ ultimate goal.

And a third scenario is that of military aggression.

But we didn’t create those scenarios; they’re the scenarios present in their rhetoric. Therefore, we have the right to defend ourselves, to prepare to defend ourselves, so that there are no surprises and no defeat.

And we always try to avoid comparisons with other nations. Because to compare us with another nation would be to ignore the strength of our institutions, the unity of our heroic people, and the determination of the majority of our people to defend the Revolution to its ultimate consequences.

Our history and our traditions of struggle, our attachment to sovereignty, independence and self-determination, which cost us so much work to achieve.

We will continue to defend peace, seeking dialogue and ensuring that dialogue allows us to resolve the contradictions in our bilateral relations and moves us away from confrontation. But for that to happen, there must also be a willingness on the part of the United States government.

And there’s an example in Venezuela: 32 Cubans heroically gave their lives defending their principles, defending their convictions. What wouldn’t millions of Cubans do who are willing to defend the Revolution, sovereignty, independence, and who want to maintain the self-determination we have in this country?

You’re mentioning the U.S. government’s public statements about Cuba, but you’re talking to them. The CIA director was here, and, on the other hand, you also recently met with U.S. Southern Command near Guantanamo Bay. In other words, there are ongoing discussions. So, what are you willing to compromise on? What are you unwilling to compromise on? Where are the red lines?

We can have a civilized dialogue like the one the United States has with other countries, it also considers adversaries, regardless of ideological differences. But, in addition, we could have trade relations, cultural, academic, sporting, and scientific exchanges… There could be unrestricted tourism from both sides.

Throughout history, there have been talks or attempts at talks, though not always through official channels. One of the most significant dialogues took place during the Obama administration, when we even re-established relations between the United States and Cuba. There was a complete opening in relations that benefited both countries.

We have always advocated dialogue, and for this reason, our officials have held talks in which we sought to resolve our bilateral contradictions in order to find areas of cooperation where we can move forward with projects that benefit both peoples and guarantee the security of both peoples, of Latin America and the Caribbean, of the region in which we live.

These are conversations that must be approached with great responsibility, discretion, and sensitivity, because they deeply concern the relations between our countries and between our peoples, and they will allow us to build spaces for dialogue that facilitate progress in that relationship and move us away from confrontation.

But it must be a dialogue without pressure, on equal terms, without conditions regarding changes to our political and social system, without considerations concerning our independence, our sovereignty, and our self-determination; a dialogue that observes a principle of reciprocity and respects international law. Therefore, we are drawing red lines there.

There can be no imposition of a change in the political system. The internal affairs of our country are not at stake. This dialogue cannot be based on a position of strength or pressure exerted on the country. And it must be approached with responsibility and discretion.

When distorted accounts of this dialogue process emerge, one wonders: why do they resort to such a shameful practice of claiming things weren’t actually discussed? Why do they feel the need to portray themselves as the ones steering the conversation to a point where we have no way out, or putting us under immense pressure, or conditioning us?

We would never accept that. And when anything touches on those issues, there will always be a firm position from the Cuban side and a refusal to continue a dialogue under those conditions.

Now, we believe that dialogue is necessary. There are many things we are open to, such as American investments in Cuba and American businesses operating there. But we are not the ones limiting them; they are limited by the laws of the embargo itself and by the embargo policy.

If the United States wants to have that kind of relationship with Cuba, it has to lift some of the limitations imposed by the blockade and the executive orders.

There has always been one country playing the role of aggressor and another the role of victim. The United States has always been the aggressor, and Cuba has always been the victim. There is also an asymmetrical relationship: the one that has pursued an aggressive policy, a policy of blockade, a policy of offense toward the other party, has been the United States toward Cuba.

We have also had conversations on topics such as terrorism and transnational crime, migration issues, covert operations against Cuba, terrorist acts orchestrated in the United States against Cuba, aspects of law enforcement, and the dialogues at Guantanamo Naval Base.

For years we have maintained a monthly dialogue with representatives of the U.S. Armed Forces. One month it takes place on the base and the next month it takes place on Cuban territory. And that was suspended by the United States government.

But the truth is that during this second Trump administration, the blockade has intensified, and the threats have grown. What do you foresee between now and the end-of-year holidays, which are so, so important for everyone? What do you think might happen between now and the end of the year?

As a revolutionary, one always maintains an optimistic view of life. And while acknowledging that we are living through a very complex, very difficult situation…

And uncertainty weighs heavily as well.

We are part of a people who have set a global example of resilience and heroism. And one cannot betray that history. Furthermore, we trust in international support; there is widespread support for normalizing relations and establishing a constructive dialogue.

There is also the possibility that dialogue can help overcome this situation. And, on the other hand, I believe in humanity. There are many in the world who want a better world, who want a different international economic order that is fairer, more inclusive, and that provides opportunities for everyone. There are many in the world who disagree with having a supremacist, hegemonic country that dictates the rules.

“There are many people in the world who want a better world, who want a different international economic order that is fairer, more inclusive, and that provides opportunities for everyone. There are many people in the world who do not agree with having a supremacist, hegemonic country that dictates the rules.”

There are more and more people, more governments, more States that, supported by their people, defend multilateralism and more inclusion, more equality and more opportunities; that do not look down on the peoples and countries of the global south.

And that idea has to reach the world; it has to be faced with dignity. Because what’s happening in Cuba isn’t just happening in Cuba. It happened in Venezuela, it’s been happening in that cruel genocide being committed every day against the Palestinian people in Gaza, it’s happening in Lebanon, with the aggression against Iran.

The world needs to realize that we are all facing a multidimensional aggression from the United States government that manifests itself in a global war that is ideological, cultural, and media-driven.

It is ideological because the United States is trying to impose its hegemony on the world; it is cultural because, to impose its hegemony and make everyone think like the United States, it has to erase the cultural identity of all our peoples and our countries, our histories and our cultural roots; and it is media-driven because, to achieve this, it develops a huge media strategy based on slander, reputation assassination, and repeated lies, as they are doing with Cuba.

What did they do to Venezuela? They created the narrative that it was a narco-state, that Maduro was a dictator, that there was no democracy in Venezuela, and the infamous connection between Maduro and the Cartel of the Suns. And when they launched that entire media campaign, they attacked the country, even while they were in talks with it. That’s where they demonstrate their treachery, how treacherous they are. They illegally kidnapped a president and took him out of his country to try him illegally in the United States. And two days later, the Cartel of the Suns was gone. All the evidence disappeared.

Let’s remember the war in Iraq, when they claimed there was a biological weapons program, and the biological weapons never materialized. Or the war with Iran under the pretext of a nuclear weapon, and there has been no nuclear activity on the part of Iran.

Will a dignified world allow this to be the way things work, this perversity? Or is the world unable to learn from the lessons of history? This is the same as fascism, this is the same as what Hitler did in Europe. Will the world return to that barbarity? Because the issue isn’t just Cuba; what’s happening to Cuba could happen to any country.

“Is a dignified world going to allow this to be the way things work, this perversity? Or is the world unable to learn from the lessons of history? This is the same as fascism, this is the same as what Hitler did in Europe. Is the world going to return to that barbarism? Because the issue isn’t just Cuba; what’s happening to Cuba could happen to any country.”

If I could change anything about the last five or six years—something you sometimes hear in certain circles here in Havana—instead of investing so much in the hotel and real estate sector, could more have been invested in energy and food sovereignty, and in education and healthcare, which are the symbols of the Revolution and are now being severely impacted? Or perhaps some economic reform that wasn’t implemented or was postponed, which would have put us in a better position to face this critical moment?

We’ve always focused on our shortcomings and mistakes, but they’ve also shaped us. And we talk about many things, some more accurately than others, because many of the reforms we’ve proposed have been virtually impossible to implement.

Because to invest you need foreign currency, you need to operate within certain international financial and economic relationships. It’s not just about wanting to change, but also about having the ability to change.

We have made mistakes, there are mistakes, and we must also see under what conditions those mistakes are made, in the experience of a besieged city, and there is also the fact that the amount of reforms that have been made throughout the times of the Revolution is not recognized.

Today, for example, the U.S. government doesn’t recognize the openness that has existed regarding the private sector and the incentives for foreign investment. It’s not that Cuba is changing; it’s that they want us to change the way they want, with total privatization and the adoption of a neoliberal model. That’s not our model.

We don’t tell the United States what changes it should make; those are their problems. I believe history will tell how wrong we were, and even if we hadn’t been wrong, the blockade has been the fundamental cause of our current situation: take away the blockade, and we’ll see how  things work out . If you take away the blockade and we’re still unable to move the country forward, to continue transforming and improving our society, then the conclusion could be that we were incompetent and didn’t do what we were supposed to do.

But this country, under a tightened blockade, manufactured COVID vaccines and has health and education indicators that, while not satisfactory to us, are better than those of most countries in the world. The equality in Cuba, the security in Cuba, the respect for human dignity, the non-discrimination, the solidarity with other parts of the world…

The US government says we received unpaid fuel from Venezuela, and that’s another lie. We provided medical services, and those services were compensated with fuel. The problem is that this way of being, of acting, of conceiving life differently, doesn’t fit into the mindset of a supremacist, of someone who thinks they are above others, of someone who treats Latin America and the people of Latin America as their backyard. And now, with the Monroe Doctrine updated with a Trump corollary, our people are being despised.

If we’re so incompetent, why are they blocking me? Why don’t they just let me collapse on my own? Because they have no interest in Cuba improving. That’s a lie. They want to seize control of Cuba, just as they’ve tried to seize control of other places in the world, to extract its resources, to control them, not to improve people’s lives.

And what we always dream about is how we can overcome adversity with everyone’s participation.

You said that the United States was seeking, among other things, a social explosion. Now July and August are coming, a very hot season with power outages. And it’s the fifth anniversary of July 11th. Do you think the circumstances could be right for an explosion? How do you plan to deal with dissent?

We have our programs for each of those scenarios to address them. But right now we have a grassroots mobilization program with neighborhood-level projects, led by young people, focused on how, at the community level, we can improve food production, support vulnerable populations, and address issues related to energy, recreation, culture, sports, and spirituality.

There is a culture of resistance, a culture of creative resistance.