By Thomas L. Friedman, The New York Times, April 9, 2019
 |
| Students demanding action of climate change in March. Photo: Tom Brenner, Getty Images. |
Here’s some news you may have missed. Southeastern Africa got hit
in March with a cyclone that United Nations officials say was one of the
worst weather disasters to ever strike the Southern Hemisphere. “Ever”
is a long time.
The storm swept
through Mozambique, Malawi and Zimbabwe, killing hundreds. My friend
Greg Carr, who runs the Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique, told me
that the lions, elephants and zebras sensed the storm coming and moved
to higher ground to avoid the flooding. Among the people and birds that
survived, many of the former lost their homes and the latter their nests and eggs.
While
this historic weather disaster was unfolding, President Trump was
urging Republicans not to kill the Democrats’ Green New Deal proposal —
not because Trump wants to work with it, but because he wants to run against it in 2020.
Trump
wants to take the Green New Deal, co-sponsored by Senator Ed Markey of
Massachusetts and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of the Bronx,
and mock its aspiration to urgently decarbonize our electric grid,
transportation sector, industries and buildings, while pairing all that
with programs to ensure that every American can get a job and have
access to health care and “safe, affordable, adequate housing,” as well
as other social goods.
AOC’s rejoinder: “For everyone who wants to make a joke about that, you may laugh, but your grandkids will not.”
She
is right. And given the choice between a “Green New Deal” that
envisions scaling justice for all and Trump’s “Black New Deal,” which
protects profitable pollution for the 1 percent, my heart is with the
greens. But my head says you can’t transform our energy system and our
social/economic one at scale all at once. We have to prioritize
energy/climate. Because for the environment, later will be too late.
Later is officially over.
And if
Democrats approach this right — with a barrage of political ads paired
with a focused green strategy, like the “Green Real Deal” proposed by
Ernie Moniz, Barack Obama’s energy secretary, and Andy Karsner, George
W. Bush’s assistant energy secretary for renewable energy — they can win
on this issue in 2020 and make Trump the laughingstock.
I’d
pound Trump with these points, but they will be effective only if
married to a “Green Real Deal.” For Moniz and Karsner, that would
involve every state or city adopting its own version of a plan
California approved last year called S.B. 100.
S.B.
100, which was spearheaded by State Senator Kevin de León, an unsung
hero of the green movement, mandated that power companies steadily
increase carbon-free electricity on their grid until it reaches 100
percent by 2045.
As David Roberts wrote for Vox,
de León kept “the bill simple and direct enough to command broad
support. … Somehow, everyone saw themselves in S.B. 100. Labor and
business, nukes and renewables, markets and mandates, cats and dogs —
somehow the bill hit the sweet spot. It contained enough substance to
matter, but not so many bells and whistles that everyone found something
to hate.”
The law sets a steadily
rising standard for California power generation companies: 50 percent
renewables by 2026, 60 percent renewables by 2030 and 100 percent
carbon-free — so as to include energy sources that aren’t actually
renewable, but don’t emit carbon dioxide— — by 2045. So wind, solar,
geothermal, biomass, large hydro, nuclear power and natural gas paired
with carbon capture and storage (C.C.S.) can all play, plus whatever new
clean power gets invented. And the steadily rising California standard
guarantees they’ll all have a growing market to sell into.
A
Green Real Deal would be a nationwide effort to inspire and enable
Democrats and sensible Republicans to come up with state and local
versions of S.B. 100 and thereby stimulate America’s earth race — not space race — to get to national net-zero emissions by 2045, or earlier.
It
could garner a lot of G.O.P. support in wind states, businesses could
make money off it, and it would put Trump totally on the defensive.
As Moniz and Karsner wrote in an essay on CNBC.com:
“Climate deniers, as well as those with demonstrably impractical,
short-term, feel-good solutions, are moving us sideways when forward
motion is essential.”A Green Real Deal, they argue in The Santa Barbara Independent, would set “ambitious, but achievable, stretch goals that can be flexibly met and spur innovation and prosperity.”
Trump
is vulnerable to a bipartisan, industry-friendly plan like this. Last
year, The Atlantic reported that “a coalition of 34 student groups from
around the country — including 23 chapters of the College Republican —
announced the formation of Students for Carbon Dividends, a bipartisan
group calling for national legislation to fight climate change. … It
marks the first time that a coalition of College Republican groups has
publicly backed a climate-change policy.”
Glenn Prickett, founder of Rock Creek Strategies,
which advises organizations and companies on how to incorporate the
value of nature into economic development, remarked to me: “I have been
sensing something in the air that I have not felt since the late 1980s —
when global warming first became prominent and Time magazine
made Planet Earth the Person of the Year — and that is that people
really want the government to take this issue seriously. I have to give
AOC credit for helping get it back on the agenda.”
Prickett added: “I spent 25 years talking about what would happen if we don’t address this issue. Now I have to correct myself and say what is happening.”
The impacts are real and they are here, “but what is new is that while
the politics remain polarized, business leadership is getting behind
this issue and we now have the technologies to create scale solutions.”
I
repeat: Later will be too late. So let me end where I began — with Greg
Carr in Mozambique’s Gorongosa Park, one million acres of wilderness,
which has been protecting both wildlife and the 200,000 people living
around it.
First of all, Carr noted
by phone, “nearly half of Gorongosa Park is now a lake,” thanks to
Cyclone Idai, but its trees and soils “acted like a giant sponge and
absorbed tons of water,” so flooding of communities downstream was not
as bad as it could have been. Parks mitigate climate extremes.
“Hurricanes are going to be more of a problem, and more nature is the
solution. I am talking to the government about creating another 250,000
acres of wetland conservancy to the south of us to soak up more water,
because this will not be our last cyclone.”
It
was also Carr’s 260 park rangers who delivered 100,000 pounds of food,
rescue teams and new seeds for replanting flooded crops to all the
villagers living around them. (To help, go to gorongosa.org/cyclone_relief_fund.)
Carr wants to see national parks in Africa transformed from just
tourist sites to economic development engines, absorbers of climate
change and first responders to disaster.
Low-lying coastal cities in America should be thinking the same. Nine out of 10 homes in Beira — Mozambique’s fourth-largest city, on its coast — were devastated by Idai. Gorongosa is upstream from Beira and absorbed enough water to prevent that port city from being wiped off the face of the earth, Carr said.
A Green Real Deal — if framed and focused properly — could wipe that smirk right off that smirk right off Trump’s face.
that smirk right off Trump’s face.Trump’s face.
No comments:
Post a Comment