Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Gaia's Garden. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Gaia's Garden. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, March 15, 2012

716. Book Review: Gaia's Garden: A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture Design

By Kamran Nayeri, March 15, 2012

Toby Hemenway. Gaia's Garden:A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture Design, Second Edition, 
White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2009 

About 10,000 years ago, some groups of our species made a transition from gatherer-hunter way of life to permanent agrarian settlements. Recent research show that this transition, called the Agricultural Revolution, was not some rational choice for a better way of life.  It is suggested that climate change forced some gatherer-hunters to use existing knowledge and technology to eke out a living from agriculture and that standard of living of the early agricultural settlers was probably lower than their gatherer-hunter contemporaries.  However, it was on the basis of these agrarian settlements that class societies emerged and evolved up to the present day capitalist world economy.  In the process, competing social organizations—whether gatherer-hunter groups or pastoral (nomadic) tribes—were either suppressed or absorbed into class societies’ “civilization.”  Thus, the emergence and rise of class society (domination and exploitation of direct producers by a ruling class) was founded on the basis of domination and exploitation of nature.  Modern humans either domesticated animals and plants to suit our perceived needs or destroyed whoever and whatever got in Our Way of Life.  Under industrial capitalism this process has reach its critical point with the planetary crisis we face today.  Either we reverse course and attain a harmonious social organization that lives in harmony with the rest of nature or much of life on which we depend will be destroyed.   Permaculture should be placed in this context, as a revolutionary theoretical and practical step in the direction of reversing humanity’s catastrophic course.

While permaculture finds its roots in earlier forms of farming such as forest farming of indigenous people or organic agriculture, Australians Bill Mollison and David Holmgren formulated it as a method during the 1970s. According to Mollison permaculture is "a philosophy of working with, rather than against nature; of protracted and thoughtful observation rather than premature and thoughtless labor; and of looking at plants and animals in all their functions, rather than treating any area as a single project system."[1]  Peraculture originally meant “permanent agriculture.”  However, as the social aspects of the theory became better understood it has come to mean “permanent culture.” As a young field, permaculture is evolving rapidly.

As a novice gardener I purchased Toby Hemenway’s Gaia’s Garden to learn about gardening; I certainly recommend it highly to others like myself instead of any traditional gardening books.  However, it is perhaps even more useful for more experienced gardeners who are getting tired of fighting Mother Nature to maintain their garden.

The book has three parts:

  • Part One: The garden as Ecosystem;
  • Part Two: The Pieces of the Ecological Garden;
  • Part Three: Assembling the Ecological Garden.

Part One, Chapter One introduces permaculture and the garden as an ecosystem and tells the story of a number of successful permaculturally designed gardens.  Chapter two introduces some ecological principles relevant to garden design and some techniques that is explored in some detail later in the book.  Chapter Three provides a road map for designing a permaculture garden.  

Part Two deals with four components of the garden as an ecosystem: soil, water, plants and insects, birds and other helpful animals.

Chapter Four is about the soil (Hemenway notes how it is degraded in English language as “dirt”). As Hemenway points out that soil is where “the dead are brought back to life.” Only recently scientists have began to view the soil not just in terms of its physics and chemistry but also as something alive.  A teaspoon of good pasture soil contains a billion bacteria, a million fungi and ten thousand amoebae.  Combined with clay, silt, sand, water, air, humus, assorted molecules, and small critters that make up the rest of soil, it is a complex life giving force.  Hemenway offers a great introduction to understanding and developing healthy soil.  Topics covered include recycling, composting and mulching.

Chapter Five deals with water conservation and use and is similarly informative and practical.  It begins with the observation that only 3 percent of the Earth’s water is fresh water and that three quarter of fresh water is frozen. Half of what remains is embedded in rock 2,500 feet or more below the surface.  Thus, only 0.375 percent of the planet’s water is useable and accessible in the form of lakes, rivers, groundwater, and atmospheric water.  Water is indeed a scare resource.  Hemenway covers a number of techniques for catching water, designing grey water systems, and creating wetlands.

Chapter Six is on plants and begins with an instructive outline of the many roles of a tree. This outline is powerful because in a couple of pages it undermines the mechanical worldview of nature so prevalent today where speices are viewed in terms of their utility or disutility for humans (click here for the text). Instead, Hemenway demonstrates how a tree is multifunctional and part of a complex ecosystem in which everything and everybody is connected to everything and everybody else.  He then singles out a number of plants for illustration including Maxillian sunflower, goumi, maypop, comfrey, mashua and bamboo.  Given this context, plants are also classified and discussed as mulch makers, nutrient accumulators, nitrogen fixers, soil fumigators and pest replants, insectary plants, fortress plants, and so on.

In Chapter Seven Hemenway introduces the reader to the role insects, birds and other helpful animals (e.g. chicken, ducks, rabbits) play in a permaculture design.  He discusses predatory insects, parasitic insects, pollinators and weed feeders.  He also discusses birds and how to attract them to the garden as well as techniques such as chicken “tractors” and rabbit cages (more on these later).

Part Three deals with the implementation of the permaculture design.  In Chapter Eight Hemenway discusses creating plant communities—where each plant supports others.  He begins with early attempts to return from monoculture to polyculture including Ianto Evans’s polyculture and Jakakot’s advanced polyculture.  Next, he introduces the concept of guilds defined as “a group of plants and animals harmoniously interwoven into a pattern of mutual support, often centered around one major species, that benefits humans while creating habitat.” (p. 183).

Chapter Nine offers design ideas for garden guilds using natural plant communities as guide.  He introduces techniques such as function-stacking in guilds. He then proceeds to “super guilds” (a guild is organized around a tree and a super guild around a number of trees). 

Chapter Ten introduces the concept of food forest. Chapter Eleven offers techniques for permaculture design for cities where land and space is scarce. Hemeway devotes the last chapter (Chapter Twelve) to brining together all the key ideas he has introduced in the book and adds a few more general ideas to show how the whole is larger than the sum of its parts. In fact, some readers may want to browse this short chapter before reading the book to get a sense of how various ideas may will come together.

Hemenway has written a wonderful book about permaculture home-scale garden design with many practical suggestions rooted in a philosophy of nature that  includes aesthetics and ethics.  Expanding on the ideas of Masanobu Fukuoka (the visionary founder of the Natural Farming movement) he writes:

“…[G]uilds ask for a subtle adjustment of our relation with our environment.  The order of a conventional row-crop garden is the order of the machine.  This regimentation invites us to view plants as mechanical food factories. We fuel them with fertilizers, service them with rakes and hoes, and measure their production in bushels, bins, and tons. We view the plants as part of our dominion. In a guild, we are but one living being among many others; and, like all other animals enfolded by this community, we nurture and are nurtured by an almost-wild place. We prune and cull, as do the deer and mice. The fruit we leave does not rot on the ground to breed disease; it is gladly devoured by many companions.  We turn over a bit of soil, and the worms turn over yet more. We participate rather than rule. With guilds, we begin to shed the mantle of command and return to nature the many responsibilities we have unnecessarily assumed.” (p. 207)

In my view, this ethics of permaculture is consistent with the ethics of ecological socialism—a future society where permacture will become the norm and not a marginal activity.  However, Hemenway is not always consistent is applying this ethics.  The idea of “chicken tractors” and “rabbit cages” suggested by him in Chapter Seven as a way to scratch the land and/or produce manure is not consistent either with the ethics he outlines in the book and quoted above or with the ethics of an increasing number of people who are concerned if not with animal liberation, are at least concerned with their welfare.  The idea of “Free range chicken” trumps Hemenway’s “chicken tractors”  and the like. 

1.  "Healthy Environments and You". Shirley MacLaine.com, Inc. and MacLaine Enterprises, Inc.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

858. How Permaculture Can Save Humanity

By Toby Hemenway, September 22, 2010


Toby Hemenway is the author of Gaia's Garden: A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture, which for the past six years has been the world’s best-selling book on permaculture. He is an adjunct professor in the School of Graduate Education at Portland State University, Scholar-in-Residence at Pacific University, and a biologist consultant for the Biomimicry Guild. He teaches, consults, and lectures on permaculture and ecological design throughout the US and other countries. His writing has appeared in magazines such as Natural Home, Whole Earth Review, and American Gardener. He lives in Portland, Oregon, where he is developing sites and resources for urban sustainability.




Related posts:

709. Permaculture: The Many Roles of a Tree


716. Book Review: Gaia's Garden: A Guide to Home-Scale Permaculture Design

Monday, April 13, 2015

1802. The Case for Simplicity

By Ted Trainer, Simplicity Institute, April 2015


Why try to life more simply.  I think there are two main lines of argument. The first is that global sustainability and justice cannot be achieved unless we live much more simply than the average person does in rich countries today. The second reason is that living simply enables a richer personal life.

“Simplicity” here refers to material “living standards”, i.e., to the amount we buy and consume.  The fundamental assumption in consumer-capitalist society is that he more e are able to purchase and use and have, he higher our wealth and welfare and quality of life will be.  That's why constantly increasing the GDP is claimed to be the supreme goal.  However it is increasingly being recognised that this assumption is literally catastrophically wrong.  The pursuit of greater material wealth is now the basic cause of the ecological and other global problems now threatening our survival. The main reason for transition to The Simpler Way is that it must be carried out if we are to achieve a sustainable and just world. However following discussion will deal firstly with the second point, to do with why living more simply can enable more meaning and satisfaction to be enjoyed.

THE PERSOAL BENEFITS: ENRICHING THE QUALITY OF LIFE.

In a society obsessed with possessions and wealth it might seem silly to suggest that living in materially simpler ways can enable the achievement of a higher quality of life than most people have in consumer-capitalist society.  Following are some of the reasons supporting this claim.

Liberation!  Not having to earn and pay out so much.
A “normal” lifestyle in consumer-capitalist society is not possible unless one does far more working, earning and buying than we should have to. All that work is taking precious life time that could be going into more fulfilling pursuits. Consider for instance the enormous cost in time, money, and worry involved in acquiring a “normal” house, not including land. 


If we assume the cost of building the house is $150,000 then the sum to be repaid to the bank will be about $300,000. But to be able to pay that much after tax is taken from earnings around $400,000 will have to be earned. The cost of a medium sized house (e.g., 160 m2 excluding land) per square metre would be around $2,500.

In my Transition to a Sustainable and Just World (Trainer 2010) I detail the probable cost to build my ideal tiny mud brick house, which I believe would be suitable for a young couple.  The floor area would be c. 40 square metres. If additional storage is needed it could be provided by a simple workshop and other sheds nearby, adding to rainwater collection area. Lifetime heating and cooling costs (in Sydney region, 34 degrees south) would be minimal, and there need be no cost for water supply and sewage removal. The estimated $4,500 cost includes water tanks and solar panels, and averages $113 per square metre, around 5% of the above sum for a normal house. ( Compared with the recent Australian average new house area the figure is 3%.)  If we assume that a small family might be comfortable in a house four times as big as this example the total cost might be $18,000 compared with $400,000, assuming no borrowing is needed and that income is too low to tax significantly. 

Much cheaper houses than this example can be built from cob.  (See Bee, 1997.) Earth-built vault or dome dwellings are cheaper still, as curved roofs can be built from mud, surfaced by a waterproof skin.

No cost has been included for labour, because I would build the house myself with assistance from friends and a local builder, and count the time as enjoyable leisure.

About 100,000 Australians want a house but can’t afford one.  Another 100,000 are homeless and must live in friends’ houses, or on the streets.  In a market economy profits are maximised building big and luxurious houses, so no small, cheap and sufficient houses are built. 


That’s a lot of money and time that could be saved and put into interesting and rewarding activities.  How long does it take to earn $395,000?  How much worry about losing ones job and being unable to meet the next payment could be avoided?

Now add the time and money savings that could come from using old, repaired and hand-made clothing, furniture, bikes, toys.  Add the savings that might be made via a backyard vegetable garden and chicken pen, and via leisure interests that do not involve purchasing much commercially provided entertainment.  Many arts and crafts produce useful things.

The huge amount of time all this would make available for enjoyable and fulfilling pursuits is only one of the benefits. There would also be enjoyment from the alternative activities involved, for instance in building your own beautiful and unique and ecologically admirable little house (with assistance from friends and experienced local builders), in repairing and keeping clothes and equipment in use, in developing a thriving and inspiring garden, and in finding and accumulating dollar-cheap local sources of leisure activity, (e.g. places to cycle to for a picnic.)

 The trap that is status and respectability.
Much purchasing, especially buying housing, is driven by obsession with status.  This is an absurdly competitive society in which there is much concern to impress by appearances and readiness to judge by appearances.  There is great pressure to appear to be at least normal and respectable, certainly not odd or inferior, and if possible to be seen to be a success, prestigious, superior…and wealthy.  “Look at me…I can afford a Rolex watch and a Ferrari…I must be pretty good eh?”  One consequence is the enormous amount of time and money and resources going into the “fashion”, car and “beauty” industries.

Long ago Thoreau saw this trap, and avoided it, and badgered people to stop wasting all that time and energy.  By living simply he gained a lot of time to devote to his writing and thinking and enjoying his garden and the woods at Walden Pond.

I wear tattered and patched clothes around my homestead, enjoy repairing them, and have the same old almost-passably normal set to wear when I go out in public, including my one pair of shoes, I think I have a suit somewhere, but haven’t worn it for several decades and wouldn’t know where to look for it.  It would be interesting to calculate how much working-for-money time my wardrobe has saved me.

Less worry about “success” and “achievement”..
Consumer-capitalist society makes people discontented, not just with their income, property and wealth. Even more important is the insistance that we must strive ceaselessly for “success”. We are taught from the earliest years, especially at school, to work hard, do our best, improve, develop our talents, get on, achieve more, rise in the world, be successful. This connects with the mania with competing, beating others, being more successful than they are, being the best. Hence this society’s obsession with gold medalists, superstars and celebrities, winners and record breaking.

But I don’t want to be the best painter, or an excellent one, or even a good one.  I just want to be a contented painter, one who is good enough to enjoy painting. Of course improving my technique might lead to more enjoyment but that’s not very important to me. Similarly I only want to be good enough at tennis, gardening, carpentry and chess to enjoy these activities. I am not driven by any sense of obligation to improve.  There are of course areas where it is important to try to be as good as possible, such as where a doctor’s skill level affects the welfare of others. And being good enough does not necessarily mean mediocre or shoddy; it can be very satisfying to have “mastered” a craft and to be able to do beautiful work, without fretting about constantly improving.

Essential in The Simpler Way is being content with what’s good enough, not wanting to have the best or to be the best. This connects with appreciation, being more able to recognize one’s own good fortune, one’s worth and the value of what one has done, imperfect though they may all be.  It also connects with the fact that in consumer-capitalist society people do far too much doing and far too little being.  They strive constantly to perform, produce, achieve and improve, and they are not very good at just sitting and appreciating what they have and who they are. Again to be more able to derive satisfaction from simpler things and from what one has and what one is brings at lease some degree of liberation.  The simpler Way will make this easier to do because it involves a much more relaxed situation, enabling most people to work for money only a couple o days a week, and immersing us in a context where much life satisfaction comes mostly from just being in a beautiful landscape and community.

What makes you rich?
For many years now it has been clearly established that as a country’s average income increases measures of the quality of life rise but after a quite low level of income is reached the measures do not rise much if at all.  In fact for the very richest countries, especially the US, indices of the quality of life seem to be in a long term decline even though the GNP continues to rise. Surveys find that the factors people see as being most important for their life satisfaction are to do with having good friends, good health, a good family, and satisfying work.  The amount of property owned or monetary income or wealth they have are way down the list.

As I see it the most important factor in a rich life is having purposes, things you are interested in and want to do.  This is the main thing lacking for people who are suffering depression or are dumped into unemployment.  It is a glaring problem in many Aboriginal settlements and it is a major cause of addiction to alcohol and drugs. It is tragic that many people can find nothing more interesting to do than get high.  

Many people are forced to live in circumstances which leave them with little to do and observe and think about, and many have to struggle with low incomes and worry, making it unlikely that much of their attention will given to spirit-lifting pursuits. Most consumption must basically due to the fact that in consumer-capitalist society there is not that much else to do. Neighbourhoods are boring dormitories, there is little or no community and little incentive for citizenship in the sense of involvement in public affairs let alone in running local social systems. The Simpler Way immerses the individual in many interests, activities, roles, interactions and contributions to make.

Debauchery…blunting sensitivity.
Australia’s richest man once bet $4 million at a casino in one sitting.  Anyone who can afford that much is very rich.  Anyone who needs to spend that much to get a thrill is very, very poor … spiritually impoverished.  If you can derive interest, enjoyment and satisfaction from simple things you have access to many more life-enriching experiences than someone who can only be satisfied if he gets big and expensive things.  Consumer society puts a massive effort into enticing you to spend on ever-more expensive, luxurious, rare, exclusive, extreme, spectacular, thrilling products and experiences.  What is sufficient is not sufficient.  The result is debauchery, the deadening of sensitivity, the raising of thresholds needed for satisfaction. Films must have at least two chain-saw murders and a train wreck or they are boring.  But I once knew a little old lady who would delight in flowering weeds growing along the path.

In other words it is very important to work at acquiring simple sources of interest, meaning and inspiration. The “spiritual” quality of one’s life is what matters most of all, the extent to which one can be inspired, cheered up, delighted interested.  There are immensely powerful forces at work in consumer society producing the opposite, depression, boredom, anxiety, worry, and despair. Depression is probably the most widespread illness today. Many plod on in a grey world of more or less mindless dull routine most of the time. Those who can avoid this fate by finding interest, delight, meaning and inspiration in the simple things around them have a key to a much richer life; they are spiritually wealthy.

Much of the planet-destroying consuming going on must be due many people lacking interesting things to do.  Bored?  Go shopping. Hobbies are a powerful antidote, especially creative activities such as arts, crafts and gardening.  They provide daydreaming material available anywhere anytime.


I was a student within the formal “education” system for about twenty-seven years. Among the things I learned was a lot of Shakespeare, Latin and Ancient Greek.  I think all that remains from that is a detestation of Shakespeare in particular and languages in general.  But once when I was about nine years old two big kids came around to our classroom with a couple of boxes in which they had built dioramas, little farm scenes.  That made such an impression.  I have been a model builder ever since and that is one of the best things in my life, providing hours of enjoyable creative activity and spirit-lifting daydreaming. Especially blessed are the gardeners, for wherever we are we have abundant things to observe, think about, do, learn about and/or delight in. In a sane world a high priority of Education would be to equip everyone with hobbies.


So it is important to work at finding interest in simple things, in noticing things and being curious, in looking for connections, significance, puzzles, meaning, explanations. The more able one is to do this, the richer one’s world is. The more things that catch your attention and interest and prod questions and connections as you go about, the more meaningful everyday experience is.  If only big, expensive, spectacular things grab your interest you will be much less often interested in anything.  This can be put in terms of openness, awareness, sensitivity and the capacity to be observant.  Some people notice things that might have gone unseen, or realize there is significance and meaning in things others might miss.  We adult humans have a strong tendency to get bogged down in a normal, every-day, routinized, take-it-for-granted consciousness that makes us oblivious to the wonders and miracles all around us. “That is only an ant.”  “That is only a daisy.” But some people are struck by what they run into and see in in them interesting aspects to mull over.  


Today I came across a little cone in the sand, and ant lion’s trap.  I know a bit about them but it struck me for the first time that the condition of the sand in the cone must be crucial, because if the slope is not steep enough the ants could climb out after falling in.  The slope will be set by the laws of physics operating on grains sliding down, and the kind of soil at the site, so this probably determines where ant lions can and can’t live.  Wet or clay soils wouldn’t do. Is the slope always the same? Why does it form at that angle? Maybe different soils have different shaped sand grains and some slide more readily and would form more shallow cones.  Could sand form at a slope I couldn’t climb? Is there a size limit here, so that big ant lions couldn’t evolve? Must look this up tonight.

This connects directly with John Dewey’s conception of Education.  He saw the point of Education as becoming more able to make meaning out of the things one encounters.  This is the point of gaining knowledge.  The more I know about the world the more able I am to interpret it, to make sense of what I see or experience.  Compare what I see when I walk through the bush with what an Aboriginal hunter sees.  He knows that the broken twig there, and that mark in the sand mean that an animal went this way not long ago.  His knowledge enables him to literally see things I do not see.  The geologist sees far more than I do when we both look at the same landscape, because he understands the significance of what we are looking at, and his knowledge enables him to make connections and interpretations.  Thus he is more sensitive, open to interesting observations and ideas than I am. His world is richer and his life is richer by virtue of his greater capacity to see and be interested.

So the more I accumulate knowledge about, and interest in, the ordinary and everyday things I encounter in the world, the more sources of meaning I have access to, the richer and more awe inspiring is the world I live in.  One of the most important goals of Education should be developing the readiness and desire to observe, question, look for connections, explain, find out about, and be awed and inspired by every day things. To Dewey, Bertrand Russell and the Progressive educators the supreme goals of Education are to do with creating and harnessing interest.  As Socrates said, ”Wisdom begins in wonder.”

Mindfulness”.
I think there are important connections with “mindfulness” here, but I am not sure I understand them well. This discussion is about attention, what we attend to, think about, focus on, in the present moment.  We can choose what we attend to, although most of the time most of us plod along thinking about whatever comes into our heads, and spending a lot of time dwelling on tasks, problems and worries.  But we have the capacity to flip the switch and stop thinking about that and start thinking about something nice, calming and inspiring, if only for a moment. I’m not much good at this but sometimes when I’m grinding along a bit bogged down I have the wit to stop and look up at the trees or the garden or the sunlight and look for and attend to something nice. The effect can be an instantaneous mental house cleaning, a switch of consciousness to the new vision and the nice feelings that come with it and a sudden sweeping away of all the rubbish I was stumbling through an instant before.  Is this what the Zen master can do anytime, anywhere? My mantra is “Count ‘em boyo” … count your blessings you lucky little fellow.

Nothing matters more than feeling good, now, in the present moment.  If I could give you a magic wand that enabled you to feel good, calm, contented, appreciative, at any moment you chose, would you want a Ferrari, or a trip to Bali or a chateau in the South of France? Why would you if you could feel good without all that bother?  The debauched mind of the over-consumer can’t feel contented without buying a bigger, more luxurious or exciting or expensive item.  The person who can feel good by a simple act of mind or will, by choosing to set aside negative concerns and to attend to nice, simple, everyday things that inspire, is very very rich. 

This is a matter of attention, mood, how we think or react, and what’s in our minds, not a matter of our actual circumstances.  You can be in lousy circumstances and something flips you into feeling OK for a moment, and sometimes you don’t feel so good even though there’s no particular problem bugging you at that moment. To a considerable extent it is our mind not our situation that determines our condition or experience.  That expectations can be powerful determinants of mental and physical outcomes is evident in the effect placebos can have in medicine. Our mind perceives and interprets and sets the tone. Some of us are blessed with a tendency to optimism or cheerfulness, and so they tend to see things and events as better, nicer than those of us in the habit of seeing the glass half empty. A person who has this tendency, whether by nature or via years of discipline in a monastery, is rich in his capacity to go through life feeling good, and is unlikely to owe much if any of this form of wealth to the amount of possessions he has.  Mark Burch puts it this way; “How we think about our lives, and that we reflect on them at all, plays a greater role in determining our wellbeing than do our material circumstances.”   “What can most deprive us of a good life is not so much material scarcity as it is a host of psychological and emotional habits, delusions and logical mistakes.” (Burch, 2014, p. 227.) Was this what the bard had in mind when he said, “Nothing is either good or bad but thinking makes it so.”

The aspect of mindfulness that seems important here is not to do with thinking about what comes into mind or attention in a non-judgmental way, but about realizing that what one focuses on, attends to, thinks about, or notices can profoundly affect one’s sense of calmness, appreciation and well-being.  We can work at being more able to shift attention to and dwell on things that lift our spirits.

Material affluence is likely to contradict all this.  At least it can be expected to distract and interfere with an effort to derive at least some degree of contentment through habits of mind.  Someone once suggested that to get to paradise you first have to give all your possessions to the poor, and related this to camels having difficulty getting through the eye of a needle. Diogenes  said “…perfect indifference to wealth is the root of all virtue and happiness.” (Alexander and McLeod, 2014, p.12.) 

Education in a satisfactory society would be primarily about helping us to develop these kinds of skills, along with helping us to appreciate the abundant materially simple sources of interest and enjoyment.  It would help us to find and accumulate our personal stock of simple spirit-lifting devices, images, places, thoughts and activities.

The connection with self-sufficiency.
Because living simply means not purchasing much it means producing as much as you reasonably can for yourself, in other words self-sufficiency.  This opens up a universe of interesting activities, knowledge, traditions and skills.  I can sew, weld, solder, do basic woodwork and metal work, build a chicken shed or a windmill or a house, draw, paint pictures, sculpt, make candles and paper and mud bricks, do pottery, wood turning, plumbing, blacksmithing, make lead-light windows, do 12 volt wiring, grow vegetables and fruit and flowers, make mosaics and ornamental garden pots, cook a tolerable meal, build in rammed earth, cob and mud brick, model in clay and plaster, keep chickens, compost, make model ships, … none of them very well but all of them enjoyably and usefully.  There are many more things I want to learn how to do, including grow fish, play beginner’s violin, make electronic gadgets, preserve fruit…   These capacities enrich my life, they fill it with interesting things to think about and do, and with chicken sheds in use and models built and jobs done well to feel good about. The ultimate consumer who just buys everything and makes nothing for himself does not have access to the good feelings that come from having some degree of self-sufficiency. Among the best of these are to do with “oikos”, running a good household economy … the well stocked pantry full of home-made preserves, the vege garden organised to provide a steady flow of crops throughout the year, the neat firewood stacks ready for winter, the sound chicken pen fences ready for Reynard’s examination, the job list with some items crossed off today.

In sustainable local communities we would be among people expert in many skills and so we would learn them easily, and much of the time we would be discussing arts and crafts and technologies and projects we and others were working on.

Earth bonding.
In the new settlements of post consumer-capitalist society we will live very close to nature.  Our quality of life will depend heavily on our local ecosystems surrounding and throughout our small local economies.  We will be acutely aware that we can enjoy our perfect food and water and landscape because of Gaia’s generosity and our readiness to treat her well. This will generate humility, respect and appreciation for Gaia’s gifts.  We will delight in our many necessary interactions with nature, digging potatoes, composting, picking fruit, smelling rich soil, welcoming the rain, watching the forest gardens thrive.  Over time we will become wiser about Gaia’s ways, about the best varieties for our soils, what to plant where, the fire danger direction, where the frosts occur. 

In this situation of dependence the human/nature gap diminishes, as does any sense of superiority or mastery over nature.  We are more likely to see ourselves as part of nature and to be sensitive to her ways and to see her other creatures as colleagues cooperating in our ecosystem. When I come across a black snake I wish him a good day and watch him go about his business; he has as much right to be here as I have … and he does less damage.  I thank the bees and apologise when I steal their hard-won honey. When you live close to the ground you are constantly confronted with things to think about, attend to, be grateful for and be sensitive to.

Work.
One of the greatest tragedies wrought by consumer-capitalist society has been the destruction of work.  Hunter gathering societies don’t do any.  They just play all day, including the fun that is going on the hunt and the community ramble that is finding plant foods. ()  Even for many of those in consumer-capitalist society lucky to have “good” jobs, and lucky enough to be “satisfied” with them, work is not fulfilling.  In post consumer-capitalist Simper Way settlements we will be able to work in order to enjoy a) the activity, mostly exercising creative skills, and b) contributing to our admirable community. Most production will be at a leisurely pace and via craft activity. We will have the time to do the job well, to experiment, to learn about different techniques and materials and about the history of the craft, and to “work beautifully”.  Ruskin and William Morris saw this long ago.  When you watch an experienced crafts person you are struck by the ability to do the job with a minimum of effort and materials use, to use just the right amount of wood or nails or hammer blows, and to avoid mistakes.  Ruskin and Morris wanted almost all production to be a beautiful performance creating beautiful objects. Morris insisted that man is Homo Artis, not Homo Faber.

Community.
In my view the Eco-village movement’s most important contribution to this revolution is in demonstrating the value of community.  Members of a village are very secure from adversity, isolation or loneliness and more importantly they have access to the satisfaction that comes from sharing, cooperating and working with others, giving, and helping others to thrive.  These benefits and delights have nothing whatsoever to do with material wealth.  Indeed they tend to be found among poorer rather than richer people. This is another realm where we have much to learn from tribes and peasants.

Living in a thriving community means being exposed to interesting activities, ideas, projects, artists and craftsmen and people to talk to.  This will make it easy for us to find and develop interests that do not involve much material consumption. The above discussion of topics such as mindfulness can give the impression that to move from the consumer way to being content with simpler things requires a lot of arduous self discipline.  When the individual is trying to make the transition alone this might be so, but it is not likely to be the case in an Eco-village.

THE GLOBAL BENEFITS -- SAVING THE PLANET. 
The case for simplicity is not primarily to do with the personal or lifestyle benefits it can bring to the individual. It is to do with the fact that unless simpler material lifestyles become the norm there can be no solution to the many alarming global problems now threatening our survival.

For decades it has been obvious that rich world per capita levels of resource use are far higher than could be sustained, or extended to all the world’s people. “Footprint” analyses and various other measures indicate that rich world consumption rates are probably around ten times those that all people could have sustainably. We few could not have these rates if we were not taking most of the world’s resource output, thus condemning most people to living on far less than their fair share. This situation cannot be remedied without scrapping and replacing the present economic system, building highly self-sufficient and self governing local communities, and adopting very different values. The most important of these would have to be to do with moving to much more simple material simple living standards. (This perspective is detailed in TSW; The Simpler Way.)

However simplifying our lifestyles is far from sufficient if the transition to a sustainable and just society is to be achieved.  Eventually we must face up to huge and radical structural and cultural change, especially at the level of national an international government.  For instance national economies must abandon growth and must prevent the market from determining our fate. What we must work on here and now is the raising of the critical awareness in people in general that these changes must be pushed through some day. 

Will this case succeed?
The forces against us are gargantuan. More than $500,000,000,000 is spent every year on trying to get us to buy more, the hours worked to get money are increasing, alarmingly rising debt levels represent more money borrowed to spend, national treasurers constantly wear themselves out trying to increase purchasing, progress is seen as moving towards greater complexity and pace, no one has enough time, and getting richer without limit is the almost never questioned supreme goal of virtually all countries and people  But there is increasing disenchantment, evident in things like the Voluntary Simplicity movement, the slow food movement, and downshifting. At present these moves are small and optional. But before long they will not be. Our task is to increase the chances that when the time of troubles begins to impact seriously in rich countries many will at least have been acquainted with the possibility that simpler ways might make more sense.

References:
Alexander, S and a. McLeod, Eds., (2014), Simple Living in History: Pioneers of the Deep Future, Melbourne, Simplicity Institute.

Burch, M., (2014), Mindfulness, in Alexander, S and a. McLeod, Eds., (2014), Simple Living in History: Pioneers of the Deep Future, Melbourne, Simplicity Institute.

Monday, May 28, 2012

800. A Word With the Reader: For a United Ecological Socialist Europe


Assistant Editor, Ernie, after a fist fight with a neighbor's cat.
By Kaman Nayeri, May 28, 2012


Let me put forward the following propositions for your consideration.
1.              The crisis in Europe, especially in its southern flank: Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy, offers an unmatched opportunity in four decades to educate, agitate and organize for a course towards a new and better society, an ecological socialist society.
2.             The European crisis is the continuation of the 2008 world capitalist crisis also known as the Great Recession, its current epicenter.
3.             Contrary to the claims of (bourgeois) economists and policy makers, this is not merely a financial crisis. [i] It is a multi-facet crisis of capitalism.[ii] It is a crisis of capitalist accumulation (growth). Moreover, it is a secular, systemic crisis that coincides with the planetary crisis fueled by carbohydrate-powered industrialization.  It is also a crisis of Our way of Life: a cultural crisis that of “civilization” that has been built on the premise of domination and exploitation of nature, including fellow human beings, the cultural basis of the class society institutionalized with the Agrarian Revolution, 10,000 years ago.
4.             The European crisis has already provided a pre-revolutionary situation in Greece. This was signaled by defeat of the four decades old two party system in the May 6th Greek parliamentary elections: the Pasok (a bourgeois socialist formation) and New Democracy (a right of center bourgeois party) that colluded with the troika--European Union (EU), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—to impose a bailout plan that mandates deep austerity measures lost their majority and could not form a government.  In a 300-member parliament, the Pasok took only 41 seats (13.18 percent of the vote) and New Democracy took 108 seats (18.85 percent of the vote). The anti-austerity parties surged; in particular the SYRIZA (Coalition of the Radical Left) rose to the second position with 16.8% of the vote and 50 representatives.
5.              The election was preceded by two years of intensifying mass protests, including general strikes. During the past six month the socioeconomic crisis has begun to be transformed into a pre-revolutionary situation. Self-activity and self-organization of direct producers could create an alternative revolutionary leadership to find a genuine way out of the crisis for Greece and show the way to other Euro zone countries in crisis, particularly Portugal, Spain and Italy.  
6.            It is high time for the European parties and currents that speak in the name of socialism, ecology or ecological socialism, especially in Greece and Spain where the crisis has assumed a depression-like proportions and mass resistance is strongest, to call for a United Ecological Socialist Europe as an alternative institutional framework to the capitalist European Union. Let’s not forget: European Union was formed by the European capitalist classes to serve their class interest.  A United Ecological Socialist Europe will favor a European integration from below—based on self-organization and self-activity of the European working people—to re-establish a society in harmony with itself and with nature.  The contrast between the European Union and a United Ecological Socialist Europe will not be more stark: for the former society is organized to serve the economy (the profit-making machine) while for the latter all economic activities will be organized by the direct producers in the interest of society and in harmony with nature.
7.             The slogan of the United Ecological Socialist Europe combined with transitional demands tailored to each country’s situation will help working people to imagine a workable alternative to capitalism.  In the pre-revolutionary Greece, it should be combined with a call for a government of direct producers and a constituent assembly based organizations of the Greek working people.  The constituent assembly will determine how the Greek people will proceed—as master of their own destiny empowered by their own organization and government and in solidarity with the rest of the European and world working peoples  not as hostage to the capitalist masters Greek or otherwise.
8.            The slogan of the United Ecological Socialist Europe as a perspective helps explain why dichotomies proposed in the context of the current crisis (negotiation for better terms for a Greek bailout, remaining within the Euro zone or breaking with it, nationalizing banks or not, whether to rely of the June 17 elections for a resolution to the crisis, etc.) are false choices if the capitalist system itself is not questioned. However, the perspective of a United Ecological Socialist Europe should not be taken as a recipe for an ultra-left sectarian course. Clearly, there are no ecological socialist currents in Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, elsewhere in Europe or the world with any influence among the broad masses of the working people.  This is a law of historical development: consciousness lags reality.  The slogan is not meant to maintain and to reinforce this isolation. The perspective should help to break out of this isolation through participation in the building of the mass movement as it emerges in concrete situation and to build unity in action and encourage widest discussion and build all forms of participatory democracy among all revolutionary minded individuals and currents.
*     *     *
There have been 99 posts since my last communication (nos. 701 to 799 inclusive).  As usual, the focus has been ecology, environment and ecocide (11 posts), global warming and climate change and other planetary crises (16 posts), evolution and evolutionary theory (10 posts), science and methodology (8 posts) and issues regarding the Cuban revolution (11 posts).

Nine post deal with various species and four with natural history, four were book/film reviews and seven posts offered alterative visions, including ecological socialism.  A number of posts dealt with labor, anti-war and protest movements.

As I state regularly all signed articles represent the views of their author(s).  They are posted here because they relate to a subject of our interest and some from the mass media can even represent current bourgeois thought.  Only unsigned articles are the points of view of Our Place in the World.

A list of hotlinks to the last 99 posts follow:

FAIR USE NOTICE
This web log (blog) contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, social, economic, foreign policy, human rights, scientific, cultural, educational, health and legal issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . All the materials contained in these pages are properly attributed. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you have to contact the copyright owner.





[i] For the past two year, the austerity approach to the European public debt favored by the German bourgeoisie represented by Angela Merkel, Chancellor, and supported by the French president Sarkozy, has been applied. The approach calls for frontal attack on the living standard of the working people to resolve the capitalist crisis as the debt-relief package for Greece exemplifies.
However, the test of events has discredited this approach. Greece and Spain where the austerity program has been implemented are in depression-like conditions. Unemployment rate in Greece stood at 21.7 in January 2012 and in Spain at 24.1 in March. Youth unemployment in both countries stands at 50%. Understandably, austerity has also led to the rebellion of the working people in Greek and to a lesser degree in Spain and contributed to the defeat of Sarkozy in the French presidential elections. The resistance to austerity could spread rapidly across Europe.  At the same time, the bond market—financial institutions that purchase sovereign debt—is no more willing to purchase Greek, Spanish or Italian bonds. Public finance remains in disarray.
This has given the Keynesian policy makers an opportunity. Prominent economists, including Nobel Prize laureates Paul Krugman and Amartya Sen, have criticized the German-led austerity approach. As Sen puts it: “There is, in fact, plenty historical evidence that the most effective way to cut deficits is to combine deficit reduction with rapid growth, which generates more revenue.” The Keynesian approach to macroeconomic policy differs from the neoliberal approach in that the former admits market failure in securing “full employment” to enable workers to earn their own livelihood and (2) that it favors provision of social services necessary for a smooth functioning of the capitalist economy and society. Thus, the Keynesians argue that the capitalist state has an important economic function (that the state and the market are interdependent). 
Over the capitalist long cycle of accumulation, Keynesian and neoliberal policies have alternatively been used and proponents of each claim historical support for their approach.  However, they seldom admit instances of the failure of their policies. For example, the Keynesian policies resulted in stagflation of the late 1970s and early 1980s and the 2008 financial crisis was most immediately caused by neoliberal policies. 
What is important to note is that neolibral and Keynesian controversies are about the best way to preserve the capitalist system.  They have little to do with how to arrive at a socioeconomic system best suitable for the working people and the planet.  Further, Keynesians also accept the need for austerity measures. However, they argue a pro-growth deficit spending program can soften the blow to the working people ensuring a less painful and dangerous path to recovery. 

[ii] Although the 2008 international Great Recession has manifest itself first and foremost as a financial crisis, it is neither merely a financial crisis nor it is simply due to bad (neoliberal) policies. It is the most serious systemic capitalist crisis since the Greet Depression of the 1930s.
The development of finance is integral to the process of capitalist accumulation:  it has increasing freed the accumulation process from the time requirements of the process of valorization of capital.  However fictitious capital—claims against future production; income generated by that production—is also money that is thrown into circulation as capital without any material basis in commodities or productive activity.  Thus, the potential for financial crises: speculation on future returns to capital that may or may not bear out.  All financial bubbles originate from this potential disparity.
However, if financial investment remains within reasonable bounds and valorization of capital proceeds without serious problems there will be no generalized financial crisis.  When the valorization process encounters problems and financial investment become increasing speculative as the result (because already held assumptions become invalid and because money flows from productive activities associated with industrial capital to speculation) generalized financial crisis happen as they did in 2008 and have been with increasing frequency and severity since the 1970s when the secular decline in the average rate of profit began.