Friday, July 19, 2013

1102. Wastewater Wells, Geothermal Power Triggering Earthquakes

By Christopher Joyce, NPR, July 11, 2013
A geothermal energy plant near the Salton Sea in California taps deep underground heat from the southern San Andreas Fault rift zone. A new study ties the amount of water pulled from the ground by the geothermal plant here to the frequency of earthquakes.
The continental U.S. experiences small earthquakes every day. But over the past few years, their numbers have been increasing. Geoscientists say the new epidemic of quakes is related to industrial wastewater being pumped into underground storage wells.
Now there’s new research that reveals two trigger mechanisms that may be setting off these wastewater quakes — other, larger earthquakes (some as far away as Indonesia), and the activity at geothermal power plants.
Most of these little quakes in the U.S. are too small to feel. They tend to happen in “swarms.” Over the past year, geoscientists traced some of these swarms to underground faults near deep wells that are often filled with waste fluid from the oil and gas drilling boom.
Nicholas van der Elst, a geophysicist with Columbia University’s Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, says there are lots of small faults all over the country. The injection of fluids migrates in and around the fault itself, “and kind of pushes outward on the fault walls and makes it easier for the fault to slip,” he says.
The wastewater “loads up” these faults with tension until, at some point, they slip and the earth moves.

So what van der Elst wanted to know was: “What prompts that slip?” Sometimes it’s just all that water building up. However, he discovered that in three cases in the past decade — in Oklahoma, in Colorado and in Texas — the trigger was yet another earthquake, a really big one, thousands of miles away. In each case, the large earthquakes set up large seismic waves that traveled around the surface of the earth “kind of like ripples,” van der Elst says. “You can even see them on seismometers, going around the world multiple times.”
Those three big quakes rang the planet like a bell. And when their seismic waves reached underground faults near waste wells in those three states, they nudged the tension in the faults past the brink. Soon, the area near the wells was swarming with mini-quakes.
And some of those swarms eventually culminated in pretty big temblors — in the magnitude-4.0 to -5.0, which is big enough to do some damage.
Van der Elst’s findings appear in this week’s issue of the journal Science. In the same issue, geoscientist Emily Brodsky at the University of California, Santa Cruz, reports yet another trigger mechanism for mini-quakes: the production of geothermal energy.
The power plant in question, near Southern California’s Salton Sea, extracts hot water from beneath Earth’s surface and turns it to steam to make electricity, then returns most of it underground. “What we found,” Brodsky says, “is that the earthquake rate correlates quite strongly with the extraction of water from the field” underground.
On average, extracting half a billion gallons of water per month resulted in one detectable earthquake every 11 days.
Now, scientists have known that geothermal power plants cycling water from underground can cause small quakes. But Brodsky’s research actually matches the amount of water moved to the frequency of the quakes.
These quakes are very small, she notes. But it concerns her that the geothermal plant she studied is near the southern tip of California’s San Andreas fault — the source of many of the state’s biggest temblors. “We ought to know what’s happening on the southernmost terminus of the San Andreas fault,” she says. “Of various places in the world to induce earthquakes, this is a particularly sensitive one.”
Brodsky says it’s unlikely that the geothermal plant could induce a major quake on the fault, but it’s theoretically possible. The chance is more than zero, she says, but she doesn’t know what the real risk is; that’s what she wants to find out next.
The company that owns the plant, Mid-American Energy Holdings, declined to comment on the research.
The U.S. Geological Survey’s William Ellsworth has been in the thick of this science. “One of the major questions we’re concerned about,” he says, “is, ‘How large might an induced earthquake be?’ We don’t have the answer to that, and it’s one of the keys to being able to better forecast the seismic hazard going forward.” Ellsworth says geologists need more seismic-monitoring stations and more data from waste wells and geothermal plants to figure out the risk.


Jalal said...

There are plenty of reasons to be opposed to fracking (or geothermal power plants) but I'm not sure that this is one of them. The fact that we are creating magnitude 4 or 5 earthquakes is impressive, but remember, earthquake magnitude is a logarithmic scale. A magnitude 7 quake shakes 10 times harder than a magnitude 6 quake, which is in turn 10 times larger than a magnitude 5, etc.

Can a smaller earthquake set off a larger one? You bet. But only if it was about to happen anyway (i.e. if tectonic forces had already built close to the breaking point). The reality is that the energy we provide for the small magnitude 4 or 5 quakes to occur is nothing compared to the energy released in very large quakes.

Also remember that very large quakes usually occur many miles below the surface. But the deepest hole ever drilled into the earth is less than 8 miles down, and most are far, far shorter. So the lady who is concerned about the San Andreas fault would have to explain how the stress we are causing at or near the surface could translate to such depths.

Having said that, I still believe we should not be engaging in these activities for other environmental reasons.

jorg gray said...

The continental U.S. experiences small earthquakes every day. But over the past few years, their numbers have been increasing. Geoscientists say the new epidemic of quakes is related to industrial wastewater being pumped into underground storage wells. flow centers