 |
| The Burtele partial foot after cleaning and preparation. |
By John Noble Wilford, The New York Times, March 28, 2012
Now it seems that Lucy shared eastern Africa with another
prehuman species, one that may have spent more time in trees than on the
ground.
A 3.4-million-year-old fossil foot found in Ethiopia appears to settle
the long-disputed question of whether there was only a single line of hominins
— species more closely related to humans than to chimpanzees — between four
million and three million years ago. The fossil record for that period had been
virtually limited to the species Australopithecus afarensis, made famous by the
3.2-million-year-old Lucy skeleton.
Of perhaps more importance, scientists report in the journal Nature,
published online Wednesday, the newfound foot not only belonged to a different
species but also had evolved a distinctive mode of locomotion, which scientists
described as “equivocal.” It clung to the trees and never adapted to
terrestrial mobility outright.
The Lucy species had long before evolved almost humanlike upright
walking, bipedality, as attested by the Laetoli footprints in Tanzania from as
early as 3.7 million years ago. This other species was still built for climbing
trees and grasping limbs. It was capable of walking, though less efficiently and
probably at an awkward gait
At a pivotal period in prehuman evolution, the discoverers concluded,
two lines of hominins practiced contrasting locomotion behavior. Their feet,
mostly, told the tale: the divergent, opposable big toe, long digits and other
bones of the newfound species did not match the feet of afarensis. Lucy’s foot
had a strong arch and the big toe was lined up with the other four digits, much
like the feet of modern humans and all critical for effective bipedality, while
retaining some agility for climbing trees.
Yohannes Haile-Selassie, a paleoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum
of Natural History in Ohio, and his colleagues said the species the foot
belonged to remains undetermined, for lack of any cranial or dental remains
associated with the specimen. But they said the foot was strikingly similar to
the earlier hominin Ardipithecus ramidus, nicknamed Ardi, which lived 4.4
million years ago, also in what is now Ethiopia.
Ardi’s foot also had a divergent big toe, similar to those of apes and
gorillas, for tree climbing, though Ardi was an occasional upright walker.
Daniel E. Lieberman, a human evolutionary biologist at Harvard who was
not involved in the research, wrote in a commentary for the journal that the hominin
foot “is a valuable addition to the fossil record as it extends the existence of
Ardipithecus-like feet by a million years.”
This and other recent discoveries, Dr. Lieberman said, indicate “that
there was more diversity in hominin locomotion than we had previously thought,
and not all of it took place on the ground.”
Donald C. Johanson, the discoverer of the original afarensis specimen
Lucy, admired this new member of the rarefied fossil kingdom. “It’s a lovely
little foot to have,” he said, agreeing that its similarity to the Ardipithecus
mode of locomotion suggested the existence of “two parallel lineages in this
long time period.”
Dr. Johanson, who is the founding director of the Institute of Human
Origins at Arizona State University, discovered the Lucy skeleton in 1974, only
30 miles from the site of this latest find. In February 2009, at a place in the
central Afar region known as Burtele, a member of Dr. Haile-Selassie’s team,
Stephanie Melillo, spotted the first bone fragment eroding out of sandstone.
Eventually, eight bones of a hominin foot’s usual 27 were recovered
and analyzed. It was a right foot, and, there being no duplication of parts, it
was thought to be from a single individual. Finding any hominin foot bones that
old is rare, Dr. Haile-Selassie said. They are small and delicate, especially
vulnerable to scavenging and decay.
Beverly
Z. Saylor of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, a team member and an
author of the report, said that at the time this hominin lived, the region had
many lakes and streams with wooded shores, thus ample opportunities for
arboreal habits. The dating of sediments where the bones were embedded was
conducted by the Berkeley Geochronology Center in California.
Another author,
Bruce M. Latimer of Case Western Reserve, said the findings clearly showed that
the adaptation to bipedality, though considered one of the decisive transitions
in early human evolution, was not a single, isolated event. One group, the Lucy
species, relinquished the arboreal habitat and became functionally committed,
long-distance walkers. For reasons unknown, another group, represented by the
Burtele foot, maintained a climbing foot and stayed at least part time in the
trees.
In hindsight, Dr.
Latimer said, “it is apparent which group succeeded.” Homo erectus appears to
have been the first to walk on a fully modern foot.
The discoverers themselves, as well as other paleoanthropologists,
cited the need for more fossils to determine to bodies that went with such a
foot and their possible relationship with the much earlier Ardipithecus.
“The implications of this limb diversity for human evolution,” Dr.
Lieberman wrote, “will require researchers to continue getting their feet dirty
in the field and the lab.”
Dr. Johanson said the Burtele site was a relatively new area of
exploration and so the prospects were good for “finding the critical teeth and
jaws needed as the next step.”
Ian Tattersall, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of
Natural History in Manhattan, who said he thought the Burtele foot “really
interesting” and confirmation of hints of diversity in hominin mobility at this
period, still cautioned against “jumping to too many conclusions as yet.”
New fossil discoveries are not always blessed with immediate
consensus. When the 3.5-million-year-old Kenyanthropus platyops was found in
Kenya a decade ago, the discoverers reported that it indicated the presence of
another species alongside Australopithecus, but that interpretation remains in
some doubt. Likewise, a few scientists remain skeptical of the status of
Ardipithecus as a hominin; they argue that it was actually an ape that evolved
limited bipedalism.
Dr. Lieberman seemed to be touched also by an unscientific atavistic
influence.
“Human
evolution is often portrayed as a triumph of bipedalism, but who among us has
not occasionally regretted our species’ comparative clumsiness in trees?” he
wrote. “I, for one, am pleased to know that some hominins retained feet well
adapted for arboreality millions of years after we started to walk on two
feet.”
No comments:
Post a Comment